Search Results

Search results 1-20 of 966.

  • The latest image for C2 contains one bug that striked in environments with IPv6 enabled/propagated via DHCP: forum.armbian.com/topic/3953-p…findComment&comment=42780 Please check this first and also whether things change if you eliminate all interface details from OMV's config.xml and also eliminate eth0 in /etc/network/interfaces, then reboot (DHCP will work since network manager now takes over) and then change/add in OMV UI eth0 again.

  • Just as a referene the summary what makes these OMV SBC images generated with Armbian's build system somewhat special: forum.armbian.com/topic/3953-p…findComment&comment=44097 Edit: almost forgot to mention: All of ayufan's OMV images for ROCK64 also contain those relevant performance stuff (we added that a while ago already) so it's fine to choose his OMV images too

  • Slow transfert SMB OMV 3

    tkaiser - - CIFS/SMB

    Post

    Quote from matteu: “What is my problem ? ” Well, hour hard disk most probably? Please keep in mind that HDD all get slower the more they're used (capacity wise): forum.armbian.com/topic/1925-s…findComment&comment=15319 And test locally storage performance on OMV with eg. iozone (apt install iozone3)

  • Quote from Muffkins90: “i am almost 100% sure they they configured for 1GB speed ” What about verifying this first? Grab iperf and jperf.exe and test at the network layer. If you're staying below 100Mbits/sec you know where to search for next. For local storage tests I would recommend iozone ('apt install iozone3') and for combined tests I would recommend Helios' LanTest (since eliminating the client side storage bottleneck often involved). BTW: older 2.5" 5400 rpm SATA drives that are not entir…

  • Quote from lsdfr: “the one last question, whats the /etc/cron.daily/log2ram: actually do ? ” Nothing, it's a bug on the older images. Please delete the file and use the search field in the upper right corner for 'folder2ram' (since this is active in OMV instead of Armbian's log2ram)

  • Quote from lsdfr: “First is 4GB in size the other 11GB and 310mb at the end free. ” Ah, then you're using an older image and the fs resize happened already. If it's really just 2 partitions then they should be both ext4 (we switched to btrfs later but this needs then a 3rd ext4 partition at the beginning to boot since Hardkernel's u-boot can't cope with btrfs directly). Untested but should work: delete the 2nd partition since it seems to be unused anyway and then just Source Code (2 lines)SD car…

  • Quote from fmomv: “I'm now somewhat familiar with RPi, so i like to continue using it, because I'm not the hardcore-kernel-recompiling linux-expert. ” Hehe, yeah. There's always an absurd excuse to justify using the worst possible platform possible. None of the other way more performant and suitable ARM platforms for OMV requires knowing what a kernel or even Linux is.

  • btrfs file system issues

    tkaiser - - General

    Post

    Quote from tranz: “Then read some post regarding raid5/6 not very good option with btrfs file system ” You should start to read more carefully (or better articles). While btrfs contains own RAID5/6 implementations that are known to cause troubles in situations the usual 'I play RAID at home because I don't understand the difference between availability and data protection' dude never will run into there's nothing wrong using btrfs on top of an existing mdraid6 other than using RAID-6 if you coul…

  • RAID5 with unexplained error

    tkaiser - - RAID

    Post

    The redundant RAID modes are only about availability ('business continuity'), backup provides data protection. It's as simple as this.

  • Quote from clickwir: “This short video covers some of the high points. ” And does a great job in explaining RAID-1 totally wrong.

  • RAID5 with unexplained error

    tkaiser - - RAID

    Post

    Quote from danieliod: “/srv/dev-disk-by-label-RAID/lost+found/#98893575 ” It's already where it belongs to, fsck sent it to this directory and somewhere else this data is missing (please search the web for »what is 'lost+found'«). So maybe the above syslog message is just telling you that there is a file you should have an eye on (no idea, I don't use ext4 for valuable data any more since years even if it can be considered one of the most robust filesystems around)

  • Quote from Ken: “i will try to 16GB card ” For satisfying results burn it only with Etcher (no need to decompress, Etcher will verify burning process and save you from some common SD card troubles). It's strongly recommended to always test your SD card with either F3 or H2testw first to check for counterfeit/broken cards.

  • Quote from Ken: “Maybe script not work ” Exactly. Your SD card shows less than 15500000 sectors capacity (7.3 GB) and this is an indication it needs to be replaced urgently since SD cards of this size are old, slow and cause troubles later anyway (failing rather sooner than later)

  • Quote from hammondb4: “Win32diskimager (or your standard procedure in linux) ” This is a horrible tool since it does not verify what it tried to write. Better avoid it until it got a verify function (it's unbelievable that this has never been added). There exist patched versions (for the simple reason that Win32diskimager is horrible without verify) but today we should simply use Etcher (the sole existence of this tool is that 'burning went wrong' happens way too often and everywhere). Quote fro…

  • Quote from Ken: “When i need to use SSH upgrade debian jessie security and openmediavault fix the new problem mmcblk0p2 the space was not enough me to upgrade. ” This means no automatic fs resize has happened and this can either mean you use an SD card smaller than 8 GB (either 4 GB or even smaller or an already broken 8 GB card where available data has been remapped). You should check and provide output of 'df -h' and in case you use a 8 GB card or with lower capacity you need to buy a good SD …

  • OMV öffnet nur 2 Eingabefelder

    tkaiser - - General

    Post

    Quote from rapibus: “I'm the only user/admin. ” Did you follow exactly the install notes? New approach for Raspberry Pi OMV images (all the stuff F3 and Etcher included, also at least waiting for your Raspberry Pi to reboot after a couple of minutes or maybe even half an hour with a slow SD card)? If not you know the reason you run into troubles.

  • Quote from adinis: “I have no clue what it all means ” Most probably just that you lacked patience. The readme on the download page states that it'll take up to 15 minutes with slow SD cards until installation finishes on first boot. Then the RPi reboots and is ready (and then this problem should be solved already). So in case that's possible simply re-image your SD card with Etcher after you checked it with F3 (see here for details) and try it again. Same applies if you didn't use Etcher on the…

  • Replace failing disk on ZFS pool?

    tkaiser - - General

    Post

    Quote from sardaukar: “It's doing it now at 151M/s with 8h38m to go, down from the initial estimate of 200M/s. ” Well, to me this looks like a lot less real resilver performance since with RAIDZ a resilver takes only care about the used data and not full capacity. So with a 'traditional' RAID5 6TB would need to be resynced (block device layer knowing nothing about filesystems) while with RAIDZ and given I understand the output above correctly (6TB-4.88TB used) it's just a 1.12 TB resilver instea…

  • OMV 4 - plug-in list

    tkaiser - - Updates/Upgrades

    Post

    Quote from jata1: “i don't think rock64 and docker is a good idea ” I heard of the opposite, some of the Hypriot guys run really large RPi 3 docker installations (and that's toy grade compared to ROCK64 both wrt IO and networking) but I never tried it and also don't know about OMV integration (no idea whether the plugin works or not).

  • Replace failing disk on ZFS pool?

    tkaiser - - General

    Post

    Quote from sardaukar: “Resilvering 5.99TB now with an ETA of 9h44m ” 6 * 1000 * 1000 / ( 9.75 * 3600) == 170.x MB/s. A bit high for RAIDZ1 with WD RED. How much capacity is the pool using? Care to provide output from 'zpool list'?