Getting anything faster than sustained 115 MB/s is very difficult. The highest theoretical is 125 MB/s on gigabit. With the older 5400 RPM drives you have, you are probably getting the best result you can.
roughly,
lan speed 1000Mbps = 125MB/s
most consumer hdd have 100MB/s sequential read
(if you use raid 0 or similar, speed will be double, failure rate is also double)
you cannot exceed 125MB/s if you share files via ethernet (bottleneck)
there is also filesharing program overhead
so.. I think your speed is normal
===
changed unit according to @gderf's advice
thx!
This drive was tested with 107 MB/s:
http://www.tomshardware.com/re…tb-hdd-caviar,2331-3.html
I get from 80-90 MB/s.
@luxflow - You should either spell out bits and bytes or use their standard abbreviations.
A small b is bits and a capital B is bytes, if you were talking about his Mbps statement.
Or did I totally miss something.
Also I hooked up my external usb to my windows machine and I'm transferring files to OMV at anywhere between 105 MB/s and 112 MB/s.
When I mentioned my speed earlier, I had the external hooked up to the OMV computer.
A small b is bits and a capital B is bytes, if you were talking about his Mbps statement.Or did I totally miss something.
What you missed is that he edited the post to reflect my comment about bits and bytes.
Ok, good to know.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, I have a NAS with 6 x 2.5" HD's a 2 TB and I have 1000er-Net. My Up/Downloadspeed is 118 - 120 MB/s ☺. The only problem is, I have changed my NAS from OMV to NAS4Free. A zfs-Raid is always faste than a Linux-Raid if you note the following:
- use only Intel-Lan-Chips
- Ram
- more RAM
- even more RAM
And, zfs please nativ, not as a plug-in
Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!
