The samba protocol as a lot of overhead. It will use cpu. Was the freenas system running a different version of samba? Were the systems connecting via the smb version?
The samba protocol as a lot of overhead. It will use cpu. Was the freenas system running a different version of samba? Were the systems connecting via the smb version?
Pff, I didn't check about smb version, as I was on a rush, will try tomorrow, though don't know if I will be able to. The only thing to notice also, is that smb was not running that much high out of proxmox, than inside.
Have you done similar checks before? Is that happening also for you?
Have you done similar checks before? Is that happening also for you?
Never checked but I don't really smb anymore (just nfs).
SMB should take not more that 50% of cores on Gigabit(just checked).
SMB should take not more that 50% of cores on Gigabit(just checked).
I mean the total of cpu is not more than 50% but have you tried out of proxmox and inside? Did you watch any difference?
Never checked but I don't really smb anymore (just nfs).
Are you using also NFS for windows PCs?
No,i checked only on physical machines, i always split nas and virtualization.
Are you using also NFS for windows PCs?
My systems run Linux.
Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!
