Help to find the best samba driven directories structure

  • Hi,


    I'm installing a new OMV nas for a friend, and I have to decide about the way data will be stored.
    It has to be user-friendly, and completly transparent for beginners user (no SSH, no FTP, ... only windows samba shares)


    The NAS is build of 1x SSD 256GB and 4x HDD 3TB.
    I partionned the SSD to a 30GB system partition (OMV_OS), and the remain space to another partition (OMV_DATA)
    OMV_DATA partition is used mainly for Deluge/PyLoad downloading and seeding directory, and temporary folder.
    Each HDD have only one big partition.


    My main concern is about file copy between downlad folder and target directory (movie, tvshows...)
    I need to find a way to achieve server side copy, because my friend use only WiFi on his laptop, so copying a 10GB movie take a loooong time (3MB/s)
    From my understanding, server-side copy works only if source and target are located under the same samba share.


    So I though about something like this:



    As OMV_DATA is limited in space, I need to use symlinks or Greyhole to move files in the big drives.

    • So is using only one smb share [DATA] could allow me server-side copy in that case?
    • I will need to declare a share folder for each subdirectories (with privileges and permissions)
    • Then create a samba share for [DATA] and each of its subfolder ([VIDEOS], [PICTURES]...) as greyhole landing zone need to be samba shares.
    • Only [DATA] will be browsable
    • but... will it works? How samba deals with share containings share?

    Thanks

  • Setup some rsync jobs and have your friend log into the web interface and manually run them.

    omv 5.6.13 usul | 64 bit | 5.11 proxmox kernel | omvextrasorg 5.6.2 | kvm plugin 5.1.6
    omv-extras.org plugins source code and issue tracker - github


    Please read this before posting a question.
    Please don't PM for support... Too many PMs!

  • I just made a quick test.
    samba overrides sub-folder privileges.
    My [DATA] share has Read/Write privileges for all users, and [Videos] only Read.


    When I access videos folder via \\OMV\DATA\Videos, I can make write operations!
    But using \\OMV\Videos, only read permissions.


    So sharing the whole [DATA] folder is dangerous.
    Maybe make it hidden, just for maintenance stuffs...

  • Thats the problem with sharing subfolders... and it confuses many users.


    I'd suggest to not share subdirectories differently. I'd rather setup multiple folders and share them individually, and a "/" share for the admin.


    Oh and also use rsync or something like that the way aaron suggested to sync the movies/tv ahows.... but feluge should have some options for it... or use filebot for it...


    Greetings
    David

    "Well... lately this forum has become support for everything except omv" [...] "And is like someone is banning Google from their browsers"


    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.

    Upload Logfile via WebGUI/CLI
    #openmediavault on freenode IRC | German & English | GMT+1
    Absolutely no Support via PM!

  • ok, thanks for the response.
    I think I will go with a "/" share to the admin.


    I'll also investigate JDownloader and see if there is a plugin to move completed downloads to another folder, according to user defined tags (like utorrent)

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!