Proxmox Kernel

    • Offizieller Beitrag

    Just guessing I need more packages.

    It might be easier to add the repo but these are the packages you should need:


    pve-firmware

    pve-headers

    pve-headers-5.11

    pve-headers-5.11.21-1-pve

    pve-kernel-5.11

    pve-kernel-5.11.21-1-pve

    • Offizieller Beitrag

    it may break other things.

    This is all it should add at most


    dmeventd

    dmsetup

    grub-common

    grub-pc

    grub-pc-bin

    grub2-common

    libdevmapper-dev:amd64

    libdevmapper-event1.02.1:amd64

    libdevmapper1.02.1:amd64

    liblvm2cmd2.03:amd64

    libspice-server1:amd64

    lvm2

    pve-firmware

    pve-headers

    pve-headers-5.11

    pve-headers-5.11.21-1-pve

    pve-headers-5.4

    pve-headers-5.4.124-1-pve

    pve-kernel-5.11

    pve-kernel-5.11.17-1-pve

    pve-kernel-5.11.21-1-pve

    pve-kernel-5.4

    pve-kernel-5.4.119-1-pve

    pve-kernel-5.4.124-1-pve

    smartmontools

    omv 7.0.5-1 sandworm | 64 bit | 6.8 proxmox kernel

    plugins :: omvextrasorg 7.0 | kvm 7.0.13 | compose 7.1.4 | k8s 7.1.0-3 | cputemp 7.0.1 | mergerfs 7.0.4


    omv-extras.org plugins source code and issue tracker - github - changelogs


    Please try ctrl-shift-R and read this before posting a question.

    Please put your OMV system details in your signature.
    Please don't PM for support... Too many PMs!

  • Hm, there is a source code from aaron ,on adding the kernel, but it would be something like this:

    Code
    wget -qO - http://download.proxmox.com/debian/proxmox-ve-release-6.x.gpg | sudo apt-key add -
    Code
    sudo apt update && sudo apt dist-upgrade

    and then add kernel 5.11:

    sudo apt install pve-kernel-5.11 -y


    Test as always

    • Offizieller Beitrag

    Just the kernel and headers installed but didn't work. Not sure why. So I installed the repo. Apt wanted to remove 43 packages that would have maid it not worth the effort. They modify the stock buster kernel so I just wondered if a newer (modern) kernel might be a big improvement. It works well enough it is not worth the effort.


    Thanks again.

    • Offizieller Beitrag

    Apt wanted to remove 43 packages that would have maid it not worth the effort.

    They remove the individual firmware packages and replace them with one pve-firmware package. not a big deal at all.


    They modify the stock buster kernel so I just wondered if a newer (modern) kernel might be a big improvement

    The proxmox kernel is the Ubuntu LTS kernel and in my opinion is much more stable than the Buster backports kernel.

    omv 7.0.5-1 sandworm | 64 bit | 6.8 proxmox kernel

    plugins :: omvextrasorg 7.0 | kvm 7.0.13 | compose 7.1.4 | k8s 7.1.0-3 | cputemp 7.0.1 | mergerfs 7.0.4


    omv-extras.org plugins source code and issue tracker - github - changelogs


    Please try ctrl-shift-R and read this before posting a question.

    Please put your OMV system details in your signature.
    Please don't PM for support... Too many PMs!

    • Offizieller Beitrag

    Unfortunately most packages it wanted to remove had untangle-feature in the name. Defeating the purpose and features of untangle. It would be nice if it didn't require a lot of work. I will just wait for the next version. I think they are slow to adapt so I was wondering if it might be easy to update the kernel. Seems it would be more than I suspected.


    Thanks


    Proxmox 7 has been released by the way. Debian 11 has not. Going to wait a while for that too. LOL

    • Offizieller Beitrag

    I can confirm that 5.19 kernel is working great at all my OMV machines

    I will look at adding the option to install. As always, you noticed the new kernel before me : )

    omv 7.0.5-1 sandworm | 64 bit | 6.8 proxmox kernel

    plugins :: omvextrasorg 7.0 | kvm 7.0.13 | compose 7.1.4 | k8s 7.1.0-3 | cputemp 7.0.1 | mergerfs 7.0.4


    omv-extras.org plugins source code and issue tracker - github - changelogs


    Please try ctrl-shift-R and read this before posting a question.

    Please put your OMV system details in your signature.
    Please don't PM for support... Too many PMs!

    • Offizieller Beitrag

    there is some problem with it and boot on zfs, so be warned.

    For keeping data clean, I like ZFS. It definitely has a place for data drives. But, using ZFS on a boot drive...?


    Can you think of a few good reasons or a use case for using ZFS on a boot drive?

    • Offizieller Beitrag

    Can you think of a few good reasons or a use case for using ZFS on a boot drive?

    Automatic bootable snapshots. I am actually running zfs on the boot drive on my laptop running Xubuntu 22.04. It takes a snapshot after basically every apt command and adds an entry for the snapshot in grub. But there are thousands of packages that have to work together in a desktop environment. Debian servers are so stable that I think this is overkill for OMV.

    • Offizieller Beitrag

    6.1 is working great atm, but i can see on proxmox forum that there is some problem with it and boot on zfs, so be warned.

    Thanks. 6.4.5 is in the repo.


    • Offizieller Beitrag

    Automatic bootable snapshots. I am actually running zfs on the boot drive on my laptop running Xubuntu 22.04. It takes a snapshot after basically every apt command and adds an entry for the snapshot in grub.

    That's pretty impressive. Automatic you say - no configuration required?

    _____________________________________________

    While it doesn't add grub entries for snapshots, Timeshift does versioned backup of the boot drive. It can use Rsync which means a simple filesystem like EXT4 can be used. I was thinking about playing with Timeshift to see if a user friendly process (easy boot drive versioning) is possible.

    On the other hand, you're right. Boot drive versioning for Debian/OMV seems over kill. With the flashmemory plugin, even with years of use, I have yet to have a good quality USB thumbdrive fail. A cloned backup seems to be plenty of insurance.

  • Hi,


    I am setting up a new openmediavault 6 server with zfs.


    This what I already did:


    1. Installed openmediavault 6
    2. installed omv-extras
    3. installed latest proxmox kernel (Linux 6.1.0-1-pve) and booted it
    4. tried to install openmediavault-zfs and get the following messages:



    So I looked at the command line and see the following;



    So, I googled a bit and found that you need to "disable" the backports:


    Code
    @omv6:~# nano /etc/apt/sources.list.d/openmediavault-kernel-backports.list
    #deb http://httpredir.debian.org/debian bullseye-backports main contrib non-free

    after apt update && apt upgrade it works:



    Is this a planned behavior? Is what I did the correct way? Is there a settings in the OMV WebUI to disable the backports?


    Thanks Hoppel

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    openmediavault 6 | proxmox kernel | zfs | docker | kvm
    supermicro x11ssh-ctf | xeon E3-1240L-v5 | 64gb ecc | 8x10tb wd red | digital devices max s8
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Hm..., ok the plugin is installed:



    But when I click on "Storage - zfs" I get the following message:



    Any idea?


    EDIT: OK, I got it. After importing the pool on the command line, the zfs gui works now and I see my pool and my filesystems. Is this a planned behavior?


    Thanks Hoppel

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    openmediavault 6 | proxmox kernel | zfs | docker | kvm
    supermicro x11ssh-ctf | xeon E3-1240L-v5 | 64gb ecc | 8x10tb wd red | digital devices max s8
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Einmal editiert, zuletzt von hoppel118 ()

Jetzt mitmachen!

Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!