Hi all , so the question is why should I use dockers ? Is there any advantage ?
Why should you use or not use dockers
-
- resolved
- OMV 4.x
- razvanrudy
-
is the actual & future way to install apps, plug-ins where deprecated for next OMV5, so it's a good step to start to use dockers.
-
-
-
Hi all , so the question is why should I use dockers ? Is there any advantage ?
Yes.
It's like an App. All in one Package with no dependencies.Without Docker, you can have a situation that e.g. PLEX needs libssh > 1.3 and Snapraid needs libssh <1.3 and then the trouble starts.
Greetings,
Hendrik -
Can you provide a link to that deprecation notice? It's an important news for all plugin developers and I couldn't find any place where votdev states that plugins are "no-go" since version 5. I assume you're talking about plugins like Plex or NextCloud though, since stuff like ZFS is not achievable through Docker.
There is no official notice and Volker hasn't said the core plugins will be going this route. I have said it many times since the downloader plugins weren't ported to OMV 4 let alone OMV 5. I am trying to get people to stop using the plex plugin. Here is my opinion on OMV 5 plugins (in list form):
openmediavault-anacron - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-aoe - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-apttool - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-autoshutdown - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-backup - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-borgbackup - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-calibre - docker
openmediavault-cups - docker
openmediavault-developer - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-dnsmasq - docker
openmediavault-docker-gui - moved to omv-extras to install portainer
openmediavault-domoticz - docker
openmediavault-downloader - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-duplicati - docker
openmediavault-emby - docker
openmediavault-fail2ban - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-flashmemory - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-letsencrypt - docker
openmediavault-locate - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-luksencryption - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-minidlna - both (PORTED)
openmediavault-mysql - docker
openmediavault-nginx - docker
openmediavault-omvextrasorg - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-openvpn - plugin (PORTED but untested)
openmediavault-plexmediaserver - docker
openmediavault-pxe - docker
openmediavault-remotedesktop - docker (recommend danielguerra/ubuntu-xrdp image)
openmediavault-remotemount - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-resetperms - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-rsnapshot - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-sftp - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-shellinabox - neither cockpit has good web terminal or use wetty in docker
openmediavault-snapraid - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-symlinks - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-syncthing - docker
openmediavault-teamviewerhost - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-transmissionbt - docker
openmediavault-unionfilesystems - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-urbackup-server - docker
openmediavault-virtualbox - neither use cockpit - virtualbox isn't available from Debian 10 repo
openmediavault-wakealarm - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-webdav- docker
openmediavault-wol - plugin (PORTED)
openmediavault-zfs - plugin (PORTED)If not on this list, it is most likely docker.
-
sorry for alarm.
I apologize.
-
-
to add a bit more info, I want to post my actual dockers and how this affect to performance= no noticeable:
-
-
Heimdall
-
-
-
you can add to list svenihoney/wetty as replacement of shellinabox = docker = https://hub.docker.com/r/svenihoney/wetty
works better than shellinabox
-
you can add to list svenihoney/wetty as replacement of shellinabox = docker = https://hub.docker.com/r/svenihoney/wetty
works better than shellinabox
I've been wondering how those two compare. What is better about wetty? -
-
I've been wondering how those two compare. What is better about wetty?
works in all explorer ( firefox, chrome, edge), and is easy to use https like others dockers using letsencrypt.
shelllinabox use own certificate so I have problem to use https on firefox for example to connect remotely ( from wan not from LAN).
-
This liste of dockerized plug-in smell good!
You've tryed apache guacamole in place of shellinbox?
-
openmediavault-minidlna - docker (maybe plugin since it has always been my reference plugin for new developers)
Please consider to maintain plugin because minidlna need host install to work , bridge mode have troubles to be discover by devices (TV) in my tests.
-
-
Please consider to maintain plugin because minidlna need host install to work , bridge mode have troubles to be discover by devices (TV) in my tests.
I already ported it to OMV 5. I do think you have a problem with your docker setup though. There is no reason minidlna shouldn't work in docker.
-
I already ported it to OMV 5. I do think you have a problem with your docker setup though. There is no reason minidlna shouldn't work in docker.
Works fine on dockers in host mode, not in "Bridge" Mode.
Please can you confirm that, as you say perhaps is a missconfiguration on my side.
I use : https://hub.docker.com/r/vladgh/minidlna
and configure port 8200 in bridge mode.
but my TV ( LG & SAMSUNG)do not detect the MiniDLNA server on docker if I configure docker in "Bridge" mode
-
Please can you confirm that, as you say perhaps is a missconfiguration on my side.
I don't use minidlna. Maybe try a different docker image or leave it in host mode? Someone who uses minidlna would be better at answering this.
-
-
Works fine on dockers in host mode, not in "Bridge" Mode
You need a way to let multicast packets arrive at the container. See https://www.google.com/search?…idlna+multicast+container
-
as far as I read is not possible to do multicast on other ways than "host" mode-
eg:
https://github.com/hazelcast/hazelcast-docker/issues/39
or
https://github.com/docker/libnetwork/issues/552So the answer is ; use network mode = Host on minidlna Dockers if you want to see your videos on your TV.
Participate now!
Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!