My new janky home nas server

1. offizieller Beitrag

    Just want to show You my NAS, I´ll make it short - english is not my language



    OMV = 5.5.2-1 (Linux 5.5.0-0.bpo.2-amd64) (is OUT) ----> 6.0.25-1 (Shaitan) (Linux 5.15.30-2-pve) (is OUT) ----> 7.0-29 (Sandworm) Linux 6.5.11-8-pve (is IN)

    Case = Temporary case that i found in junk (looking for some cheap case with option to mount 8+ HDD) (is OUT) --- > Chieftec BRAVO (BH-01B-U3-OP) (is IN)


    CPU: AMD A4-500 (is OUT) --- > i3-4330T (is IN) ----> i3-4330T (is OUT) ---> i7 4785T (is IN)

    MB = Asrock qc5000-itx/wifi (is OUT) --- > MSI : CSM-B85M-E45 (is IN)--->MSI : CSM-B85M-E45 (is OUT) ---> ASUS Q87M-E (is IN)

    RAM = 16GB Kit (8GBx2) DDR3 1600 DDR3 - Overkill but it was just laying around -> 16GB (is out) --> 32GB @1600 @1,35V (is IN)

    SystemHDD = Seagate ST9160821AS 160GB 2,5' in usb 3.0 case

    PSU = Delta Electronics DPS-300AB-19 B 300W (is OUT) --- > Dell PCB014 275W (is IN)

    HDD = 4x 4TB - ST4000DM004 + 2x4TB - WDC WD40EFRX-68WT0N0 : 4x4TB in ext4 MergerFS 2x4TB - Snapraid (is OUT) - 3x8TB Seagate Exos ST8000NM001J 8TB (2x8TB MergerFS + 1X8TB Snapraid) and 1 512 SSD (2 partitions 1.OS 2.KVM+Docker) (is IN)


    Power consumption at wall: 38W --> max stress 51W --: 31W Idle -->stress : 75W


    Used for now as smb share, sFTP if needed

    Docker :

    1) Rutorrent

    2) OpenVPN --->wireguard

    3) MakeMKV

    4) Handbrake






    plans:


    1) LSI Card for more Storage

    2) Case (mayby hotswap and rack mount)

    3) Nextcloud or Owncloud




    NOW LOOKS LIKE THIS:





    THX for replay

    Well its just temporary solution so i dont bodher cuting zip ties ;)

    when if finley find suitable case that my wife accept (You know: it must be pritty and stiute for guestroom ) then I will make inside clean and nice or just move my new case to the basemant ;)

    • Offizieller Beitrag
    Zitat von Pietia(lania)

    when if finley find suitable case that my wife accept (You know: it must be pritty and stiute for guestroom )

    I forget who it was but someone on the forum called that the WAF. The "Wife Acceptance Factor". :)

    Zitat von Pietia(lania)

    more CPU power ( i7 4785T )

    Have you looked at CPU usage over a longer time using "Monitoring"?

    A pure OMV file server won't be able to use the extra power, hence I wonder what application is currently constrained by CPU power?

    omv 6.9.6-2 (Shaitan) on RPi CM4/4GB with 64bit Kernel 6.1.21-v8+

    2x 6TB 3.5'' HDDs (CMR) formatted with ext4 via 2port PCIe SATA card with ASM1061R chipset providing hardware supported RAID1


    omv 6.9.3-1 (Shaitan) on RPi4/4GB with 32bit Kernel 5.10.63 and WittyPi 3 V2 RTC HAT

    2x 3TB 3.5'' HDDs (CMR) formatted with ext4 in Icy Box IB-RD3662-C31 / hardware supported RAID1

    For Read/Write performance of SMB shares hosted on this hardware see forum here

    Gefällt mir nicht 1
    • Offizieller Beitrag
    Zitat von mi-hol

    hence I wonder what application is currently constrained by CPU power?

    handbrake and makemkv will DEFINITELY benefit from more CPU power.

    Thanks for replies but there isn't a direct answer to my question "what application is currently constrained by CPU power?"

    omv 6.9.6-2 (Shaitan) on RPi CM4/4GB with 64bit Kernel 6.1.21-v8+

    2x 6TB 3.5'' HDDs (CMR) formatted with ext4 via 2port PCIe SATA card with ASM1061R chipset providing hardware supported RAID1


    omv 6.9.3-1 (Shaitan) on RPi4/4GB with 32bit Kernel 5.10.63 and WittyPi 3 V2 RTC HAT

    2x 3TB 3.5'' HDDs (CMR) formatted with ext4 in Icy Box IB-RD3662-C31 / hardware supported RAID1

    For Read/Write performance of SMB shares hosted on this hardware see forum here

    • Offizieller Beitrag
    Zitat von mi-hol

    Thanks for replies but there isn't a direct answer to my question "what application is currently constrained by CPU power?"

    How is telling you two applications not a direct answer? Do they work with slower cpus? Yes. Are they a MUCH better with faster cpus? Yes. An A4-500 would be very slow and an i7 would give a considerable quality of life improvement. So, not sure where you are going with this...

    omv 7.0.5-1 sandworm | 64 bit | 6.8 proxmox kernel

    plugins :: omvextrasorg 7.0 | kvm 7.0.13 | compose 7.1.4 | k8s 7.1.0-3 | cputemp 7.0.1 | mergerfs 7.0.4


    omv-extras.org plugins source code and issue tracker - github - changelogs


    Please try ctrl-shift-R and read this before posting a question.

    Please put your OMV system details in your signature.
    Please don't PM for support... Too many PMs!

    As I understand it, in the current setup a i3-4330 is used.

    Looking at

    https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/…l-Core-i3-4330/2293vs2876


    For single core performance the difference is at max a 16% gain versus about at least twice the cost (more likely 4x higher).

    Most applications can only use a single core (didn't check handbrake yet)


    That's the reason why I asked 'CPU usage over a longer time' as performance gains bigger that 30-50% get usually noticed by users.

    Assuming currently CPU is only used on average for 10% of a day, 16% gain will be hardly noticed.

    omv 6.9.6-2 (Shaitan) on RPi CM4/4GB with 64bit Kernel 6.1.21-v8+

    2x 6TB 3.5'' HDDs (CMR) formatted with ext4 via 2port PCIe SATA card with ASM1061R chipset providing hardware supported RAID1


    omv 6.9.3-1 (Shaitan) on RPi4/4GB with 32bit Kernel 5.10.63 and WittyPi 3 V2 RTC HAT

    2x 3TB 3.5'' HDDs (CMR) formatted with ext4 in Icy Box IB-RD3662-C31 / hardware supported RAID1

    For Read/Write performance of SMB shares hosted on this hardware see forum here

    Einmal editiert, zuletzt von mi-hol ()

    • Offizieller Beitrag
    Zitat von mi-hol

    As I understand it, in the current setup a i3-4330 is used.

    I didn't see the cpu change.

    Zitat von mi-hol

    For single core performance the difference is at max a 16% gain versus about twice the cost.

    Most applications can only use a single core (didn't check handbrake yet)

    handbrake is very multi-threaded. so gaining two physical cores would make a huge difference.

    Zitat von mi-hol

    That's the reason why I asked 'CPU usage over a longer time' as performance gains bigger that 30-50% get usually noticed by users.

    Assuming currently CPU is only used on average for 10% of a day, 16% gain will be hardly noticed.

    Those are desktop assumptions. There are many times I will puts lots of encoding jobs in my handbrake queue and it will run for over 24 hours. So, even 16% would be hours different.

    omv 7.0.5-1 sandworm | 64 bit | 6.8 proxmox kernel

    plugins :: omvextrasorg 7.0 | kvm 7.0.13 | compose 7.1.4 | k8s 7.1.0-3 | cputemp 7.0.1 | mergerfs 7.0.4


    omv-extras.org plugins source code and issue tracker - github - changelogs


    Please try ctrl-shift-R and read this before posting a question.

    Please put your OMV system details in your signature.
    Please don't PM for support... Too many PMs!

    Zitat von mi-hol

    A pure OMV file server won't be able to use the extra power,

    Thanks, I understand now that the computer is actually a OMV multimedia transcoding & file server, that benefits from faster CPU

    omv 6.9.6-2 (Shaitan) on RPi CM4/4GB with 64bit Kernel 6.1.21-v8+

    2x 6TB 3.5'' HDDs (CMR) formatted with ext4 via 2port PCIe SATA card with ASM1061R chipset providing hardware supported RAID1


    omv 6.9.3-1 (Shaitan) on RPi4/4GB with 32bit Kernel 5.10.63 and WittyPi 3 V2 RTC HAT

    2x 3TB 3.5'' HDDs (CMR) formatted with ext4 in Icy Box IB-RD3662-C31 / hardware supported RAID1

    For Read/Write performance of SMB shares hosted on this hardware see forum here

Jetzt mitmachen!

Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!

Benutzerkonto erstellen Anmelden