omv-extras plugins - porting progress to OMV 6.x (done)

MarcS · 6. August 2022

58 very impressive!

Did you install Docker on OMV6 via the GUI fresh or did you re-use a Docker installation from previous versions (OMV5)?

Wolf2000 · 6. August 2022

Hi MarcS

On a fresh OMV6

ryecoaaron · 6. August 2022

Zitat von MarcS

I read that OMV6 is still beta.

It is not beta and docker has nothing to do with OMV. omv-extras installs docker on OMV 6 just like it did on OMV 5. I also wouldn't use a mergerfs pool for your docker path.

MarcS · 6. August 2022

I had to de-install Docker and install new. Luckily de-installing via OMV does not delete my containers.

After re-install Docker is now up and running. And yes, I am pointing the docker folder to a device path and not a mergerfc pool. thanks for the tip.

Blabla · 8. September 2022

Hi,

I wanted to upgrade from OMV6 but this line is stopping me:

Zitat

openmediavault-unionfilesystems - moving to openmediavault-mergerfs - done

I'm currently using unionfilesystems so that I can see my two disks as unique one.

Before upgrading I need to uninstall it? If yes, do I need to do anything?

Also, what about diskstats? I can't see it in the list

ryecoaaron · 8. September 2022

Zitat von Blabla

I'm currently using unionfilesystems so that I can see my two disks as unique one.
Before upgrading I need to uninstall it? If yes, do I need to do anything?

You don't have to do anything. The upgrade process should install openmediavault-mergerfs, migrate your unionfilesystems pool (which is mergerfs too), and remove unionfilesystems.

Zitat von Blabla

Also, what about diskstats? I can't see it in the list

That is a core omv plugin not an omv-extras plugin. And it is available on omv6.

Blabla · 8. September 2022

Zitat

You don't have to do anything. The upgrade process should install openmediavault-mergerfs, migrate your unionfilesystems pool (which is mergerfs too), and remove unionfilesystems.

Thanks! From the post I didn't have clear if I had to it manually.

Also thanks again for the diskstats answer

ryecoaaron · 8. September 2022

Zitat von Blabla

I didn't have clear if I had to it manually.

I changed the first post to make that more clear.

Blabla · 8. September 2022

Sorry to disturb so soon but after the upgrade I got this error:

Code

Preparing to unpack .../libarchive-zip-perl_1.68-1_all.deb ...
Unpacking libarchive-zip-perl (1.68-1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package openmediavault-mergerfs.
Preparing to unpack .../openmediavault-mergerfs_6.3.2_all.deb ...
Unpacking openmediavault-mergerfs (6.3.2) ...
Replacing files in old package omvextras-unionbackend (5.0.2) ...
Setting up libarchive-zip-perl (1.68-1) ...
Setting up openmediavault-mergerfs (6.3.2) ...
Updating configuration database ...
debian:
----------
          ID: configure_pool_dir
    Function: file.directory
        Name: /srv/mergerfs
      Result: True
     Comment: 
     Started: 14:47:59.079158
    Duration: 4.866 ms
     Changes:   
              ----------
              /srv/mergerfs:
                  ----------
                  directory:
                      new
----------
          ID: remove_mergerfs_mount_files_/etc/systemd/system
    Function: module.run
      Result: True
     Comment: file.find: []
     Started: 14:47:59.084611
    Duration: 2.801 ms
     Changes:   
              ----------
              file.find:
----------
          ID: systemd_remove_dead_symlinks
    Function: cmd.run
        Name: find /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants -xtype l -print -delete
      Result: True
     Comment: Command "find /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants -xtype l -print -delete" run
     Started: 14:47:59.087991
    Duration: 5.026 ms
     Changes:   
              ----------
              pid:
                  6065
              retcode:
                  0
              stderr:
              stdout:
                  /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/php7.3-fpm.service
----------
          ID: configure_mergerfs_Data
    Function: file.managed
        Name: /etc/systemd/system/srv-714c279e\x2d21ec\x2d45bc\x2da8cb\x2d767c97096d69.mount
      Result: False
     Comment: Unable to manage file: none of the specified sources were found
     Started: 14:47:59.093235
    Duration: 20.6 ms
     Changes:   
----------
          ID: systemd-reload_Data
    Function: cmd.run
        Name: systemctl daemon-reload
      Result: True
     Comment: Command "systemctl daemon-reload" run
     Started: 14:47:59.113958
    Duration: 210.814 ms
     Changes:   
              ----------
              pid:
                  6066
              retcode:
                  0
              stderr:
              stdout:
----------
          ID: enable_Data_mergerfs
    Function: service.enabled
        Name: srv-714c279e\x2d21ec\x2d45bc\x2da8cb\x2d767c97096d69.mount
      Result: True
     Comment: Service srv-714c279e\x2d21ec\x2d45bc\x2da8cb\x2d767c97096d69.mount is already enabled, and is in the desired state
     Started: 14:47:59.339162
    Duration: 18.009 ms
     Changes:   

Summary for debian
------------
Succeeded: 5 (changed=4)
Failed:    1
------------
Total states run:     6
Total run time: 262.116 ms
ERROR: Failed to create the default configuration: Command '['/usr/share/openmediavault/confdb/create.d/conf.service.mergerfs.sh']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
dpkg: error processing package openmediavault-mergerfs (--configure):
 installed openmediavault-mergerfs package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Processing triggers for openmediavault (6.0.38-1) ...
Updating workbench configuration files ...
Restarting engine daemon ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 openmediavault-mergerfs
Log ended: 2022-09-08  14:48:00

Log started: 2022-09-08  14:48:02
(Reading database ... 
(Reading database ... 100%
(Reading database ... 34909 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing omvextras-unionbackend (5.0.2) ...
Setting up openmediavault-mergerfs (6.3.2) ...
Updating configuration database ...
debian:
----------
          ID: configure_pool_dir
    Function: file.directory
        Name: /srv/mergerfs
      Result: True
     Comment: The directory /srv/mergerfs is in the correct state
     Started: 14:48:04.656559
    Duration: 4.759 ms
     Changes:   
----------
          ID: remove_mergerfs_mount_files_/etc/systemd/system
    Function: module.run
      Result: True
     Comment: file.find: []
     Started: 14:48:04.661910
    Duration: 2.814 ms
     Changes:   
              ----------
              file.find:
----------
          ID: systemd_remove_dead_symlinks
    Function: cmd.run
        Name: find /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants -xtype l -print -delete
      Result: True
     Comment: Command "find /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants -xtype l -print -delete" run
     Started: 14:48:04.665299
    Duration: 5.801 ms
     Changes:   
              ----------
              pid:
                  6328
              retcode:
                  0
              stderr:
              stdout:
----------
          ID: configure_mergerfs_Data
    Function: file.managed
        Name: /etc/systemd/system/srv-714c279e\x2d21ec\x2d45bc\x2da8cb\x2d767c97096d69.mount
      Result: False
     Comment: Unable to manage file: none of the specified sources were found
     Started: 14:48:04.671331
    Duration: 20.551 ms
     Changes:   
----------
          ID: systemd-reload_Data
    Function: cmd.run
        Name: systemctl daemon-reload
      Result: True
     Comment: Command "systemctl daemon-reload" run
     Started: 14:48:04.691999
    Duration: 219.16 ms
     Changes:   
              ----------
              pid:
                  6329
              retcode:
                  0
              stderr:
              stdout:
----------
          ID: enable_Data_mergerfs
    Function: service.enabled
        Name: srv-714c279e\x2d21ec\x2d45bc\x2da8cb\x2d767c97096d69.mount
      Result: True
     Comment: Service srv-714c279e\x2d21ec\x2d45bc\x2da8cb\x2d767c97096d69.mount is already enabled, and is in the desired state
     Started: 14:48:04.925390
    Duration: 18.342 ms
     Changes:   

Summary for debian
------------
Succeeded: 5 (changed=3)
Failed:    1
------------
Total states run:     6
Total run time: 271.427 ms
ERROR: Failed to create the default configuration: Command '['/usr/share/openmediavault/confdb/create.d/conf.service.mergerfs.sh']' returned non-zero exit status 1.
dpkg: error processing package openmediavault-mergerfs (--configure):
 installed openmediavault-mergerfs package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Processing triggers for openmediavault (6.0.38-1) ...
Updating workbench configuration files ...
Restarting engine daemon ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 openmediavault-mergerfs
Log ended: 2022-09-08  14:48:06

Alles anzeigen

I went into the new OMV webUI and in mergeFS I had nothing.

It's not an issue if I have to create manually a new pool, but I fear that there might some dirt in the system. Do i need to check anything in particular?

After the update i didn't touch anything, in the webui I have a pending configuration change but I was waiting before give an ok.

ryecoaaron · 8. September 2022

It might have failed because your pool is already mounted. What is the output of: dpkg -l | grep openme

Blabla · 8. September 2022

Code

root@Delibird:~# dpkg -l | grep openme
rc omvextras-unionbackend 5.0.2 all union filesystems backend plugin for openmediavault
ii openmediavault 6.0.38-1 all openmediavault - The open network attached storage solution
ii openmediavault-autoshutdown 6.0.9 all OpenMediaVault AutoShutdown Plugin
ii openmediavault-diskstats 6.0-6 all openmediavault disk monitoring plugin
ii openmediavault-keyring 1.0 all GnuPG archive keys of the OpenMediaVault archive
iF openmediavault-mergerfs 6.3.2 all mergerfs plugin for openmediavault.
ii openmediavault-omvextrasorg 6.1.1 all OMV-Extras.org Package Repositories for OpenMediaVault
ii openmediavault-sharerootfs 6.0-4 all openmediavault share root filesystem plugin
ii openmediavault-symlinks 6.0.4 all OpenMediaVault symlinks plugin
rc openmediavault-unionfilesystems 5.1.4 all Union filesystems plugin for OpenMediaVault.
ii openmediavault-wakealarm 6.0.1 all wakealarm plugin for OpenMediaVault.

Alles anzeigen

I also noticed that the pool is still avaible from windows, even if it's not the file system tab:

ryecoaaron · 8. September 2022

I just uploaded a new version of the mergerfs plugin. So,

sudo apt-get update

sudo apt-get install openmediavault-mergerfs

if that goes well:

sudo apt-get purge openmediavault-unionfilesystems

Blabla · 8. September 2022

My "special" ability in finding bugs in open source projects strikes again T_T

BTW it worked thanks a lot!

auanasgheps · 9. September 2022

Zitat von Blabla

My "special" ability in finding bugs in open source projects strikes again T_T

I feel you! The list of issues I opened on GitHub is fairly long

ryecoaaron · 9. September 2022

Zitat von auanasgheps

The list of issues I opened on GitHub is fairly long

This usually means you use plugins in strange ways that my brain doesn't think of lol

auanasgheps · 9. September 2022

Zitat von ryecoaaron

This usually means you use plugins in strange ways that my brain doesn't think of lol

Your plugins are great, I am referring to open source software in general. I opened a couple of issues to your repos but were actually requests more than issues. I reported a couple of real issues to OMV itstelf though.

rah66 · 25. September 2022

Zitat von ryecoaaron

This usually means you use plugins in strange ways that my brain doesn't think of lol

Hi ryecoaaron , can you add swap file usage data to the "Memory Usage" plugin, or make it a separate plugin?

ryecoaaron · 25. September 2022

Zitat von rah66

can you add swap file usage data to the "Memory Usage" plugin, or make it a separate plugin?

Memory usage is a core OMV widget. Wondering if it would look better as a second ring on the current memory widget?

crashtest · 25. September 2022

Zitat von ryecoaaron

Memory usage is a core OMV widget. Wondering if it [swap file usage] would look better as a second ring on the current memory widget?

Since they're both memory related, I think that's a very good idea.

rah66 · 26. September 2022

Zitat von ryecoaaron

Memory usage is a core OMV widget. Wondering if it would look better as a second ring on the current memory widget?

Yes, second circle in the widget "Memory Usage" is better than the separate widget.

Can you also combine widgets CPU Temp and CPU Utilization into one widget?

Jetzt mitmachen!