Docker Stacks

    Your docker install is mixing two things up. You do not have the image with the id a1c22f3d250f used by the container with id 75ba5e06fcd2 (which used to be your old portainer).


    I would recommend to delete the old container by docker container rm 75ba5e06fcd2 and try to get rid of this image

    docker image rm a1c22f3d250f


    If you are starting with docker-compsoe and bind a local directory, you can even try to remove the volume of the old container with docker volume rm portainer_data bt maybe before doing this, give me the output of docker volume ls and docker volume inspect portainer_data

    If you got help in the forum and want to give something back to the project click here (omv) or here (scroll down) (plugins) and write up your solution for others.

    Quote from Zoki

    try to get rid of this image

    docker image rm a1c22f3d250f

    After deleting the docker container, I couldn't run this command - "error no such image."


    I've rebooted and docker inspect portainer is referencing back to the uuid disk, so currently working.


    It says no portainer_data and does the 2 docker volumes mean 2 dockers?

    Code
    root@OMV:~# docker volume ls
DRIVER    VOLUME NAME
local     96ddc8e2e81465c5284bbe0283cd0b4031c8a1ee0d4adc4f1723381b2c598373
local     b4735ee123d12add7cf838f58d6daff597fa3351822ea780e94141c1de72ec93
root@OMV:~# docker volume inspect portainer_data
[]
Error: No such volume: portainer_data
root@OMV:~#

    volumes are created for containers, if the creator of the image defines that, nothing to worry about.

    How did you start the portainer container?


    can you repeat the commands from before.

    cat /etc/docker/daemon.json

    docker info

    docker ps -a

    docker image ls

    docker inspect portainer

    If you got help in the forum and want to give something back to the project click here (omv) or here (scroll down) (plugins) and write up your solution for others.

    Portainer starts through the webUI.

    Output too big to post but all looks good to me - there was no reference to the by-label ID.

    Thanks for your help....again!

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!

Register Yourself Login