As everybody mentioned, CPU is not the bottleneck.
Memory will be eaten up with the number of applications running in docker containers.
For me : OS + 30 containers = around 5GB
(not bad.....
)
Posts by sabamimi
-
-
OVM is very reliable,
and equally important : very helpful crowd here !
-
-
I would second that thought....Is raid really needed?
For me, (after using Raid for a long time on a Synology), the answer was no.Personally, I prefer the added disk space (using LVM) with a rigorous backup strategy.
-
interesting topic/discussion...
due to history since I had an Haproxy proxy installed on on a dedicated box before I installed OMV5 on a new server with a lot of dockers in it....,
I prefer to stick to this configuration.
This keep the all reverse proxy topic very simple and highly configurable
(just my 2 cents....
) -
Correct.
Docker Images creators wants to make sure that you do not lose data between Containers runs and therefore they define the needed Volumes "mount" points.
-
Hi there,
Not a stupid question (only an answer can be ...but I will take the risk
)You need to think about a running docker container as a virtual OS + a program (like PI-Hole or Nextcloud) online for as long as the container is in a Running state. Indeed , as you correctly imagine, when the container is Stopped (not running anymore) all the files modifications made by the various programs in the container are lost !
In order to save the data between 2 runs of the container , they implemented the concept of "Volume". a volume is a way to "map" a folder or a file from to container to the hosting machine. This way when you restart the container he can "find" his folder and file thanks to the Volume mapping.Hope this helps to grasp the Docker concept of Volume
Happy discovery to you!
Images changes is something else: it is more a change in the "template" used to create the Container and Images changes are more like a new "version" of the Docker implemented program (like a new version of PI-Hole)
-
I used Baikal on synology. It is a Cardav and Caldav server.
You can find a Docker for it
Hope this helps
-
Portainer stacks are really easy to learn and are widely documented / used by docker's devs.
It is a real efficient mean to deploy dockers and to manage NAS applications.In my (very modest) opinion, only some very closely link to the OS / users access rights applications should be handle directly by the NAS itself.
I mean functionalities like FTP / Web server / SAMBA / WEBDAV etc....should be handle by OMV itself.
Portainer (or any other leading docker management app) was a good choice
-
Wow this might be to opposite... a bit over overkill...but I like it. Im going to start looking into this now. Something like this is exactly what I was looking for.
I use it only (mostly) to send URLs to friends and family to help them download a file .....
I also use it for my own usage as a web clipboard.
-
Take a look at Droppy:
Droppy - Self Hosted File Storage Server
I have installed it on Docker / Portainer (help available if needed) but other options are possible
Features
- Responsive, scalable HTML5 interface
- Realtime updates of file system changes
- Directory and Multi-File upload
- Drag-and-Drop support
- Clipboard support to create image/text files
- Side-by-Side mode
- Simple and fast Search
- Shareable public download links
- Zip download of directories
- Powerful text editor with themes and broad language support
- Image and video gallery with touch support
- Audio player with seeking support
- Fullscreen support for editor and gallery
- Supports installing to the homescreen
- Docker images available for x86-64, ARMv6, ARMv7 and ARMv8
-
pihole is still runing despite being turned off in portainer :/is there a command i cant type to a terminal to change the port in OMV or can i just change piholes port?
If you stop the container in portainer pihole should not be running.....
-
look above : post from gderf
-
In addition, if I remember correctly,
you can also stop Pihole in Portainer to regain OMV GUI on port 80 and change the OMV port in OMV GUI.
-
In my case:
I had first to redirect OVM to use port 81 in order to free 80 for pihole....and only then both where functional.
-
Yes correct all
Thanks, I just ran it through google translate. I also looked at the official docs and it seems that doing docker compose and making sure to expose the usb devices is very easy as long as you have the correct permissions. Examples on this page: https://www.home-assistant.io/docs/installation/docker/
Further research, says that Hass.io just runs thing in docker, so all the add-ons are dockers. Running HA in a docker would mean just running the ad-ons in separate docker containers, most already have separate docker images available.
Thanks for the USB hint.
Totally correct about the containers
Cheers !
-
OK ....found it back....
But it's in french and dealing with HA Docker on Synology
-
What did you find out? I am starting a big HA project now.
A quick search did not bring anything ....but I am pretty sure I read it....maybe it was in Homeassistant forum.... I will keep looking.
I am using Home assistant myself using RPi 4 so I remember noticing it for the case I would move HA to docker (using USB dongles was another point "against" HA in docker)
Regardless I will keep looking.
-
hum ...I read in another post that add-ons stores could be installed with the Docker Homeassistant image.
will try to find it....
-
I used (long time ago) a bundle name XAMPP.
I dont know if it is still the best one around......But
you can have a list of those bundles in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…ySQL%E2%80%93PHP_packages
If you look for those in the Docker search Images:
https://hub.docker.com/search?type=image
You will find a good match.
Cheers
