Posts by Procus Aquila

Many thanks for the quick answer.

Ok, but can't you include the official DEB packages?

I have already set up dockers for customers and unfortunately I had to learn time and again that dockers sound so nice, how modular they are, etc. unfortunately do not always work optimally.

It is always to be expected with many adjustments, also I had to make the experience that updates are not executed 100% correctly.

Sure the container - principle is coming but not everyone is a technique - freak. Not for nothing leading NAS manufacturers have their software directly and dockers as an extra.

Plex in the docker, I can not offer my people, do not get along with.

Hello, first of all I am amazed.

Why was the Plex plugin abolished now?

Why is it now only possible to work with Plex in a docker environment?

I do not understand the sense. OMV 5 is based on Debian 10 Butcher ? There are official packages from Plex for this.

My media data is located on a separate NAS, which means that I would have to consider several structures via docker to access these drives.

It's easier if Plex is installed directly, then you can use the wonderful "remote mount" tool.

Also, updating Plex in the docker has not always worked for OMV in the past, so I was glad that OMV doesn't use a docker.

Is this docker act, especially what kind of tech freaks?

Just a hint:

- QNAP

- Synology

- Western Digital

- Terramaster Nas

- Xigmanas

- Freenas

They all use the direct installation method for Plex, no docker

I have already made friends with the fact that I cannot partition the hard disks during installation and I have to change all this with Gparted.

But if Docker comes into play now, the era of OMV is over for me.

No question Docker is a genius and you can do very good things with it.

But why take out Plex, what deeper sense should it make

Thanks for the quick answers,

I'm going to test it in a simulation, and if it works I'm going to use it like this.

The plugin share rootfs, is it normal to use the extras?

Question, why does OMV always take the whole hard disk? OMV is great in itself, but can't you mount a partition at the beginning?

The subsequent shrinking with Gparted does not work for me anymore (OMV 5)

I would like to use the OMV also on systems where only one hard disk is possible, it would be an advantage if the disk could be divided during installation.

I also don't want to have to use CF or USB all the time, is suboptimal

Is a solution already planned?