Hi
Similar problem. For me it was package systemd-timesyncd
After removing and install chrony the commands from this worked. (But not the script on this post)
Hi
Similar problem. For me it was package systemd-timesyncd
After removing and install chrony the commands from this worked. (But not the script on this post)
Trying
gives
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
php-pam : Depends: phpapi-20180731
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
The idead for reinstallation comes closer
What is the output of:
ls -lah /usr/sbin/omv-*
A big fu***ing oops
gives no output. Problem found?
dpkg -l | grep openmedia
also post
echo $PATH
-> 5..26
-> /usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin
Something with 5.2x. Unfortunately neither browser works nor omv- commands to ask version. What other command can show me the version?
Other problems:
your error looks like there is a unknown directive in the profited config file.
Run
dpkg --configure
and post the output
Error, because
missing
... says nothing, no message, hidden status.
Had this last night. For me the trigger seems to he having mergerfs mounts in my fstab. Fixed with remounting rw, commenting those lines, rebooting, and unticking the fstab checkbox in the mergerfs mount settings in the UI (then applying and rebooting to verify).
Not sure what changed to cause this. I thought it was that I'd set cache.files=partial in the mergerfs opts, but removing that didn't help. The only relevant looking thing error in dmesg is:
Code[ 3.753464] scsi 2:0:0:1: Wrong diagnostic page; asked for 1 got 8 [ 3.753476] scsi 2:0:0:1: Failed to get diagnostic page 0x1 [ 3.753481] scsi 2:0:0:1: Failed to bind enclosure -19
Which can supposedly be caused by delays spinning up a sleeping HDD, but no idea why that would suddenly be an issue when it hasn't before
Good idea. commenting out mergefs line in fstab mounts filesystem with rw. So "success", but doen't help because I need that
Found and running.
Returned code 1
dpkg: error processing package proftpd-core (--configure):
installed proftpd-core package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Setting up python3-six (1.16.0-2) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of proftpd-mod-crypto:
proftpd-mod-crypto depends on proftpd-core (= 1.3.7a+dfsg-12+deb11u2); however:
Package proftpd-core is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing package proftpd-mod-crypto (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of proftpd-mod-wrap:
proftpd-mod-wrap depends on proftpd-core (= 1.3.7a+dfsg-12+deb11u2); however:
Package proftpd-core is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing package proftpd-mod-wrap (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Setting up python3-pyrsistent:i386 (0.15.5-1+b3) ...
Setting up python3-more-itertools (4.2.0-3) ...
Setting up python3-zipp (1.0.0-3) ...
Setting up python3-importlib-metadata (1.6.0-2) ...
Setting up python3-jsonschema (3.2.0-3) ...
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools (0.140) ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.16.0-0.bpo.4-686-pae
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.31-13+deb11u3) ...
Processing triggers for man-db (2.9.4-2) ...
Processing triggers for dbus (1.12.20-2) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
proftpd-core
proftpd-mod-crypto
proftpd-mod-wrap
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Alles anzeigen
rc omvextras-unionbackend 5.0.2 all union filesystems backend plugin for openmediavault
rc openmediavault 5.6.26-1 all openmediavault - The open network attached storage solution
rc openmediavault-diskstats 5.1.1-2 all openmediavault disk monitoring plugin
ii openmediavault-keyring 1.0 all GnuPG archive keys of the OpenMediaVault archive
rc openmediavault-luksencryption 5.0.2 all OpenMediaVault LUKS encryption plugin
rc openmediavault-lvm2 5.0.3-1 all openmediavault Logical Volume Manager (LVM2) plugin
rc openmediavault-mergerfsfolders 5.1.4 all mergerfs folders plugin for openmediavault.
rc openmediavault-omvextrasorg 5.6.6 all OMV-Extras.org Package Repositories for OpenMediaVault
rc openmediavault-snapraid 5.0.8 all snapraid plugin for OpenMediaVault.
rc openmediavault-unionfilesystems 5.1.4 all Union filesystems plugin for OpenMediaVault.
omv-extras was installed via ppa to use cryptsetup.
Problem discussed here.
can you remount rw?
I do not think the root cause is rrdcached.
You will have to digg through the boot logs.
Yes, but only manually, not after reboot.
Well that is the first readable problem with journalctl Glad to find something.
Unfortunately the solution reports 2 errors.
works with 0 errors
works with 2 errors.
Doing system upgrade doesn't end in omv5 upgrade like omv-5.5.x as discriped on that page
Is there any command like
? I need to look for that later.
Changed fstab with
to
Nothing else. No success
Deeper problem with report from journatctl (?) seems this
and
Trying solutions.
Same problem
No success, also tried manual command.
See #2
See #3
Same problem here
Debian 10, snapraid, ext4. On some day suddenly readonly after reboot.
Tried mods from this link with no luck.
Only foreign mod that I installed is "extras" or something like that to run cryptsetup on omv5.
Got late, some other things to do...
So just stop it and accept a "bug" in a big, useful system? Sry, thats not my motivation.
Btw: One of errors found in my system, so need to apologize on that point.
After showing my /etc/fstab code to github I realized that the one line potentially crashing the system... didn't have the nofail flag O.o
After adding it and rebooting, all worked "well".
But with a new hdd and so system rewriting the line the option again disappeared and system didn't boot
Maybe just a little error in plugin?
crashtest Short answer: Yes its worth it. Even for testing whats known to be stable... more or less Whatever I don't have a deadline on that, so its just an experiment until its finished
geaves good. I will look and ask on github for mergefs.
ZitatQuote from titango20 what would the no-fail flag in fstab effect in (in case it works)?trapexit says the flag does nothing.
So why does this flag exist and doesn't show an error warning? Seems like a bug.
ZitatQuote from titango20 how does mergefs work with luks and encrypted devices? In my understanding services like ovpn and luks work like transparent services (osi-layer < 5) meaning other services (mergefs) don't care.Mergerfs doesn't know luks exists. It just creates a union of filesystems. If the filesystem is not there (LUKS not unlocked) then it can't create the union and fails. How would you fix that?? mergerfs is not a service. It is a fuse filesystem.
Either use kind of this flag to tell debian to ignore it (or even dont put to /etc/fstab) or tell mergefs to try mounting devices if user (=omv?) is ready. In omv in file system option there is a button to mount devices. Why not for mergefs = manual ? For me it seems the correct way as I also need to manually mount each device after unlocking (not working for mergefs... weird).
As of writing this I feel like mergefs service (correct?) tries to run without asking system to be ready or not.
To repeat: Just my point of view. Pls ignore if totally wrong.
Thanks for answers.
Unfortunately I don't understand mergefs and debian enough.
Do the devices need to be mount points in fstab? Maybe Im gonna experiment with that.
Linux (not just debian) starts in emergency mode when it can't mount a filesystem unless you pass arguments in fstab to not care. How exactly does Linux know it isn't important?
Thats the point (Somehow bad jokes). I see an error... Not bad that omv creates moint points for devices, but if using luks maybe the mount point is wrong as for locking and no-fail issues...? Just thoughts.
So, to write some thoughts...
- the problem is mergefs plugin. How far does it pick functions in debian system to block system from booting?
- what would the no-fail flag in fstab effect in (in case it works)?
- why does mergefs care for devices to be ready or not? At that point 3rd-party-system (omv) is not loaded at all, right?
- how does mergefs work with luks and encrypted devices? In my understanding services like ovpn and luks work like transparent services (osi-layer < 5) meaning other services (mergefs) don't care.
- what error tells debian to start in emergency mode? That mode for not finding an unimportant device sounds like a bad joke, doesn't it?
Is it possible to tell mergefs to not start after boot automatically?
I will try mergefsfolder.