Site is offline at the moment.
Posts by CaNsA
-
-
-
-
Righto.
Pulled drive 1 from the array, carried out a low level format on it and it passed with no errors.
Copied over the data from drive 2 to drive 1.
Destroyed the array and pulled drive 2 from the server.
Carried out a low level format on it and it passed with no errors.I have put both drive 1 and drive 2 back in the server.
Created a new array using drive 1 and drive 2, but specified that drive 1 is missing.
Drive 1 is currently rsyncing to drive 2
Once this is complete i will add drive1 to the raid array.
This will rebuild the array using the data on drive2.Hopefully there will not be any errors thrown up in my face.
The replacement 3tb that I received turns out to have a terribad sector slap bang in the middle thus rendering it un-usable.
-
Re-sync'd, still reporting as "Degraded"
Code
Display Moreroot@NobKitten:/# mdadm -D /dev/md127 /dev/md127: Version : 1.2 Creation Time : Fri Aug 15 01:06:49 2014 Raid Level : raid1 Array Size : 2930135360 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB) Used Dev Size : 2930135360 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB) Raid Devices : 2 Total Devices : 2 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Tue Sep 27 02:18:11 2016 State : clean, degraded Active Devices : 1 Working Devices : 1 Failed Devices : 1 Spare Devices : 0 Name : NobKitten:M2 (local to host NobKitten) UUID : 962c0810:00001583:d1b8e4e0:481e7a1d Events : 5252 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 0 0 0 removed 1 8 16 1 active sync /dev/sdb 2 8 0 - faulty spare /dev/sda -
After a bit of hunting about, I'm giving this a try.
Code
Display Moreroot@NobKitten:~# mdadm -D /dev/md127 /dev/md127: Version : 1.2 Creation Time : Fri Aug 15 01:06:49 2014 Raid Level : raid1 Array Size : 2930135360 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB) Used Dev Size : 2930135360 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB) Raid Devices : 2 Total Devices : 2 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Mon Sep 26 17:46:09 2016 State : clean, degraded Active Devices : 1 Working Devices : 1 Failed Devices : 1 Spare Devices : 0 Name : NobKitten:M2 (local to host NobKitten) UUID : 962c0810:00001583:d1b8e4e0:481e7a1d Events : 2557 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 0 0 0 0 removed 1 8 16 1 active sync /dev/sdb 2 8 0 - faulty spare /dev/sda root@NobKitten:~# mdadm --remove /dev/md127 /dev/sda mdadm: hot removed /dev/sda from /dev/md127 root@NobKitten:~# mdadm --add /dev/md127 /dev/sda mdadm: added /dev/sda root@NobKitten:~# mdadm -D /dev/md127 /dev/md127: Version : 1.2 Creation Time : Fri Aug 15 01:06:49 2014 Raid Level : raid1 Array Size : 2930135360 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB) Used Dev Size : 2930135360 (2794.39 GiB 3000.46 GB) Raid Devices : 2 Total Devices : 2 Persistence : Superblock is persistent Update Time : Mon Sep 26 19:29:12 2016 State : clean, degraded, recovering Active Devices : 1 Working Devices : 2 Failed Devices : 0 Spare Devices : 1 Rebuild Status : 0% complete Name : NobKitten:M2 (local to host NobKitten) UUID : 962c0810:00001583:d1b8e4e0:481e7a1d Events : 2562 Number Major Minor RaidDevice State 2 8 0 0 spare rebuilding /dev/sda 1 8 16 1 active sync /dev/sdb root@NobKitten:~# -
One of my drives was showing read errors, so I pulled it and replaced it with an identical 3tb HGST.
Re-sync (5hrs) went fine as far as i can tell.
The array reports as "Clean, but "Degraded" in OMV.
How can I remove this flag?
Code
Display Moreroot@NobKitten:~# cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md126 : active raid1 sdc[0] sdd[1] 2930265424 blocks super 1.2 [2/2] [UU] md127 : active raid1 sda[2](F) sdb[1] 2930135360 blocks super 1.2 [2/1] [_U] unused devices: <none>Coderoot@NobKitten:~# blkid /dev/sdb: UUID="962c0810-0000-1583-d1b8-e4e0481e7a1d" UUID_SUB="fba9b6bc-0824-c8d4-61cf-b7738bb9767b" LABEL="NobKitten:M2" TYPE="linux_raid_member" /dev/sdc: UUID="3fac3cb1-281b-bae1-5c88-23b820c6e73b" UUID_SUB="9dba2023-d531-4f26-bb82-59855f9cb15e" LABEL="NobKitten:M1" TYPE="linux_raid_member" /dev/sdd: UUID="3fac3cb1-281b-bae1-5c88-23b820c6e73b" UUID_SUB="2f910984-6d7d-1434-4ad2-5721f854c6cc" LABEL="NobKitten:M1" TYPE="linux_raid_member" /dev/sde1: UUID="59448263-0293-45d9-bb96-9390a189728c" TYPE="ext4" /dev/sde5: UUID="3bf1317d-3952-47fe-8854-7b0e00cbda40" TYPE="swap" /dev/md127: LABEL="M2" UUID="f539bc29-030c-4bdf-ac3e-2fd81569c5d5" TYPE="ext4" /dev/md126: LABEL="M1" UUID="ad965792-7ecb-484b-8718-c54b9ec74790" TYPE="ext4" /dev/sda: UUID="962c0810-0000-1583-d1b8-e4e0481e7a1d" UUID_SUB="104d783d-be32-a0e2-06b6-3586fbbf17ef" LABEL="NobKitten:M2" TYPE="linux_raid_member" root@NobKitten:~#Code
Display Moreroot@NobKitten:~# fdisk -l Disk /dev/sdb: 3000.6 GB, 3000592982016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 364801 cylinders, total 5860533168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/sda: 3000.6 GB, 3000592982016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 364801 cylinders, total 5860533168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x8d86adab Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System Disk /dev/sdc: 3000.6 GB, 3000592982016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 364801 cylinders, total 5860533168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disk /dev/sdc doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/sde: 40.0 GB, 40020664320 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 4865 cylinders, total 78165360 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x000dc242 Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sde1 * 2048 74897407 37447680 83 Linux /dev/sde2 74899454 78163967 1632257 5 Extended /dev/sde5 74899456 78163967 1632256 82 Linux swap / Solaris Disk /dev/sdd: 3000.6 GB, 3000592982016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 364801 cylinders, total 5860533168 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disk /dev/sdd doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/md127: 3000.5 GB, 3000458608640 bytes 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 732533840 cylinders, total 5860270720 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disk /dev/md127 doesn't contain a valid partition table Disk /dev/md126: 3000.6 GB, 3000591794176 bytes 2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 732566356 cylinders, total 5860530848 sectors Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes Disk identifier: 0x00000000 Disk /dev/md126 doesn't contain a valid partition table root@NobKitten:~# -
-
Look for a cheap HP N54L
Mine has been solid since the day I bought it.
-
Trying to bump up to omv3 from 2.2.5
http://pastebin.com/E7vpzifrapt.conf contains
CodeAPT::Default-Release "wheezy";// APT::Default-Release "stable";APT::Install-Recommends "false";APT::Install-Suggests "false";Any ideas?
-
OMV 2.2.5
If uninstalling the plugin when there is still a sensors window in the dashboard the webgui breaks after gui reload.
-
It's a wonderful time to be alive.

-
Not had a power outage, even for a second, in over 15yrs.
I live in a major city in the UK, our grid is pretty damn good. -
The last time I had a power outage was bout 15yrs ago,
I'm more concerned with drive failure, hence the use of a Raid.I've tested the process of awesomeness in a VM and it all seems to work fine.
Just got to move data about now.
-
24/7 - yes
UPS - no. -
Both.
The box is used for media storage and data backups.
-
Drive 4 should be fine... I hope.
I've not built a Raid array from command line before, how difficult is the process?
How reliable is a Raid5 array in OMV ?
-
Righto.
Currently I have the following setup using 4 x 3TB drives.

I would like to change it to a Raid 5 config, using the 4 drives available and a 2TB drive in my pc.
My plan,
Back up what I can from M1 to separate 2TB drive.
Break down M1 (drive 1 & drive 2)
Pull a single drive from M2 (drive 3) - will the data still be safe and accessible?
Create a Raid5 using the 2 drives from M1 and the single drive from M2 (drive 1, 2 and 3)
Copy data from the other M2 drive (drive 4) over to Raid5
Grow Raid5 to incorporate drive 4.Would that work?
Is it likely to to rip a hole in time and space?
Am I being an idiot by not understanding how things work?Cheers.
-
I am the new guys in here, read some post to say that if OS on the USB stick will be kill it in the short time, is it true?
anyone who are using the USB stick as the Operation system?Due to the high number of read/writes carried out by OMV it is a bad idea to install it on a USB stick.
-
only the upnp version would make sense i guess.
Why?
My RPi is pulling all media from my OMV box over NFS.
In fact, NFS is recommended for use with XBMC on the R-Pi due to the limited bandwidth available to the eth port.and what should the plugin do?
show a tab with the xbmc-webinterface ?
Provide a WebGUI to select folders to be monitored for additions to the XBMC SQL media library.Kinda what this whole thread is about.