Posts by Pharizna

    Ok. I’ll try to do a clean installation.


    Data from the old Data disk are not very important and I have a copy in another NAS.


    Without change the ID of the two disks and regenerate the old OMV … in the new/OMV installation there will be warnings but OMV-regen will create new shared folders, etc in the new OMV?

    It's really just a warning. If the button is available you can do the regeneration anyway.

    For it to work what you want you should previously clone the data disk. So the uuid of both data disks should be the same. After that run regeneration (despite the warning) and everything will work normally. You will have two cloned systems.

    Thank you ... but I have more questions for you.


    1. How to "previously" clone the data disk?


    2. In the regen screen there are two "strange" messages:

    NOT ALL DATA UNITS OF ORIGINAL SYSTEM ARE CONNECTED... but the only NVMe is connected. Others NVMe previously connected were unmounted.


    IT COULD NOT BE READ the information from System disk (original or actual) . Why?


    3. What's the meaning of the last message about the system is already configured ... and I must do a clean installation? I install OMV directly from an image that write in the eMMC deleting all data, etc :(

    I' trying to "clone" an OMV installation from a CM3588 device to a new NanoPi T6.


    My CM3588 OMV is working fine with the OS installed in the eMMC and with a NVMe disk for data.

    The T6 has an eMMC too where I'have installed the debian/OMV too. The data are in another NVMe too.


    I've use OMV-regen in the CM3588 and copied the files in the T6, When I tried to use these files in the T6 seems it's not correct as you can see in the screenshot attached.


    Help me, please

    OK. I understand the two variables are different... but CPU load is it related with a core or it's depends of the number of cores?


    100% CPU load = all the cores of the CPU are working at 100%?


    My problem is that OMV integration in HA not have CPU load % data that it's seems to be the most important... but I have loadings data that are less important but at least give us an idea about possible overloading of the system. It's no the best way but at least we have some valuable (historical) information.

    Thank you again


    Last question: for example with my system (4 cores) and loading equal 4 … the other variable (cpu load %) would be about 100% aprox. Ok?


    Aprox ..,

    [loading] = [cpu load % * cores number]/100 ?

    Thank you.


    For example, in my with an SBC with a CPU of 4 core it would be "dangerous" to work near (or more) than Load Average >=4. Is it correct?


    I don't have any users in my OMV actually and it's near idle but I have loadaverage (1 min) near 4 in some cases. Why? The "unit" of this variable would be not % , isn't?



    CPU utilization? In the "OMV graph" the unit it seems to be %.. ¿Dangerous? 100% ... of one CPU ... or 100% of the 4 cores?

    Hi I'd like to have some important info from my OMV in Home Assistant.

    I'm using the OMV integration for HA but I don't have any data about CPU temperature or CPU utilization.


    The integration gives good info about CPU load averages. My question is:


    How is it related the utilization and the load average? Data utilization in my case is between 2 and 15% but Load average is "always" below 1. Are in the same scale?


    Thank you in advance