I had to hook up an HDMI cable to a monitor to see anything as I cannot SSH, but this is the output.
sudo: effective uid is not 0, is /usr/bin/sudo on a file system with the 'nosuid' option set or an NFS file system without root privileges?
And here is the issue I'm seeing from the GUI.
The last command I ran was: rm /var/lib/openmediavault/dirtymodules.json in an attempt to fix some ZFS issues referenced here. Any help would be greatly appreciated. My whole system seems to have blown up! 
Alles anzeigenHave you gone into the ZFS plugin page yet since you remounted? It should prompt you to apply changes once it realizes the dataset is mounted. That should give you access to it again; if it doesn't a reboot might be required.
It may also throw an error about "Can't Find TPool in /etc/fstab" when you try to apply it. If that's the case, follow the instructions in this post to correct the issue.
That error is fixed in the next plugin release, but that release per Luxflow is waiting on the release of OMV 3.0.60.
Let us know if that fixes it, and if it doesn't there's a few other things to try. You might have to remove the share and re-add, if the above doesn't work.
Ugh, I thought I had gotten back to square one, however, whenever I try to do anything at all I get this error:
I attempted to follow the directions in the post you pointed to @wolffstarr. I thought I had gotten back to square one, but when I SSH in, none nothing is mounted properly in the ZFS pool. And browsing through the OMV gui, it looks like none of my plugins are enabled.
Edit: Upon returning to the URL of the webgui, I'm greeted by this screen:
Edit again: It seems I now cannot SSH, either.
It seems I marked this as resolved just a bit too soon. @wolffstarr, the command to restore the movies directory worked great, and I thank you for that. However, when I try to add the shared folder through the OMV GUI, I don't see the option for my movies, and the "/dev/sda1" is still in place.
Try SSHing into the server and typing sudo zfs mount TPool/movies and see how that works. ZFS has it's own mounting utilities.
Thank you! That worked beautifully. I've long debated setting up a separate server using only the command line to be more familiar with each component. In the meantime, happy to have access to my movies again!
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Some time ago, I mounted the movies share to my ftp share using the command umount --bind /TPool/movies /TPool/ftp/movies, so that I could browse the movies folder from inside the ftp folder. Everything initially worked great, but then I started getting some odd errors in Windows that didn't make any sense about me not being able to access the Movies samba share. I thought I would unmount the share from the ftp folder.
So, I accidentally unmounted my movies object using the command umount /TPool/movies.
Now my movies object is completely blank as it tried to mount sda1, which is my boot drive.
However, you can see that the data is still clearly intact at least according to the GUI.
What do I need to do to re-establish the connection at /TPool/movies and get access to my movie collection, again? Thanks!
Edit: @wolffstarr provided me with the solution to use the ZFS mounting utilities from the command line: sudo zfs mount TPool/movies
After running omv-update those packages dissapeared
I did notice something else however:
CodeW: Duplicate sources.list entry http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports/main amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/httpredir.debian.org_debian_dists_jessie-backports_main_binary-amd64_Packages) W: Duplicate sources.list entry http://httpredir.debian.org/debian/ jessie-backports/contrib amd64 Packages (/var/lib/apt/lists/httpredir.debian.org_debian_dists_jessie-backports_contrib_binary-amd64_Packages) W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problemsRunning apt-get update didn't fix the problem - is it safe to delete one of two entries or is there another way around it?
This issue is fixed in the latest omv-extras. Disable the backports repo in omv-extras and update it.
I had the same problem. This took care of it!
I just installed the plugin on a fresh VM and it seems to be working for me. Did you change the gui address to 0.0.0.0?
No, I left the GUI address at 127.0.0.1 and the Listen Address at 0.0.0.0.
Edit: Ah, right after I typed this up I saw the instructions below the GUI address line. Use 0.0.0.0 for all hose IPs.. It seems to be working after changing that. Thank you!
It is just something I would try. I don't use the syncthing plugin. So, upgrading a working syncthing setup from OMV 2.x to 3.x is not very well tested.
I apologize for my ignorance, but I'm not exactly sure what I need to change. Everything was a fresh install, so no remnants should remain from 2.0
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Did you try making a small change to one of the settings in the web interface so it would re-write the config files?
Thank you for responding. I didn't make any change in the gui or cli, is that something I needed to do?
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Hello, all, I recently did a clean install of OMV 3.0. Everything seems to be working without issue except that I can't access the syncthing webgui. Everything worked fine with 2.0, so I don't think it's anything I manually changed or pertaining to do with my network. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
sudo apt-get dist-upgradeThis worked for me as well!
Alles anzeigenI guess this statement on github says it all:
Offical ZFS on Linux [url='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamic_Kernel_Module_Support']DKMS[/url] style packages are available from the [url='https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/zfs-linux']Debian GNU/Linux repository[/url] for the following configurations. The packages previously hosted at archive.zfsonlinux.org will not be updated and are not recommended for new installations.
Since there are no zfs packages in Debian's wheezy repo, support for wheezy is done. This means zfs users should move to OMV 3.x.
Well, that seems pretty cut and dry. Thank you for your help.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
I believe this was just a move to https instead of http.
Based on some comments and what I see in the github page support for wheezy has been dropped apparently. I cant still find any official mention or announce about this.
@subzero79, how would I go about making this change to test wolffstarr's theory?
What needs to be updated? Properly would be me updating omv-extras to reflect the change.
OK, I realize that my use of words wasn't the best. I'm trying to rid myself of this text and get the latest packages for zfs
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
I would upgrade an current installation. Clean install is preferred.
OK, so suppose I just wanted to update the ZFS repository, properly, and staying on 2.0 in the meantime. Would I simply uninstall and reinstall the plugin without any terminal commands?
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
As someone with the following criteria:
1. On OMV 2
2. Still using the old ZFS plugin (haven't updated in awhile)
3. Looking to upgrade to OMV 3
I just want to make sure that I understand correctly, I need to:
1. Uninstall ZFS plugin/de-select from repos
2. Run this command:
apt-get autoremove debian-zfs libnvpair1 libuutil1 libzfs2 libzpool2 zfsutils spl-dkms zfs-dkms openmediavault-zfs3. Upgrade OMV
4. Re-enable the ZFS repos (use Testing to get the Debian repos)
5. Install the plugin
6. Import the pool
Does this sound right? Thanks!
Hey, all. I updated the plugin and got a fancy new button... that doesn't seem to work, even after I kill the service. Any thoughts?
Ah, that's brilliant. Thanks for your help. I will definitely work on this later tonight!
Edit: I'm tickled w/the initial tests. Going through a single LUN with 1 NIC yields 110-117 MB/s read-write speeds. Once I get two port NICs in the host and client machine, I'll run more tests to see if the throughput is doubled if the LUNs are striped on the client side.
@nicjo814
Here is what I'm working with. Is this not correct? It works great with the rest of my applications/plugins.
@shadowzero
Sounds great! I'm looking forward to when I can dedicate some time to testing this out.
Hmm, I'm not sure what I'm missing. I have a ZFS pool called TPool that is a stripe of mirrors (equivalent of RAID10) that is currently being referenced by several shares. When I go to the iSCSI plugin, I allow for my username "johndoe86x" for the incoming and outgoing transfer modes. I have the identifier and alias as test, and when I go to add a LUN, there's no option to add anything.