Posts by SiliconSage

    You do know that OMV has one developer and I am the only dev of omv-extras plugins, right? We both work on OMV in our spare time.

    Yes, I did know. And I do really appreciate your work.


    But I was talking about the technical backgrounds. For me as an end user (on amd64 actually) it is just too risky to update my server and have to be afraid every time it could break.


    Did Volker consider to use some other base like Buildroot?


    ZimaOS and Home Assistant do rely on it:


    Home Assistant Operating System | Home Assistant Developer Docs
    The Home Assistant Operating System is a purpose built operating system specifically designed to run Home Assistant on single board computers and x86-64…
    developers.home-assistant.io

    Honesty, this (sometimes fatal) dependency on upstream Debian made leave OMV again after just one month.


    Also, the lack of warning before the 7.5.0 update in spite the amount of network less rendered machines made me doubt.


    There are many free alternatives out there like ZimaOS, TrueNAS Scale, YunoHost where you receive reliable updates from one source.


    Maybe one day, OMV will also shift away from plain Debian and control and maintain its own packages.


    Nevertheless, thank you Volker and team for providing this nice piece of software for free and your countless hours of support.

    I setup openmediavault from scratch today and installed the kubernetes plugin.


    openmediavault 7.6.0-1

    openmediavault-k8s 7.4.3-1


    After activating the plugin I tried to copy the token to clipboard. But it does fail with: Failed to copy data to the clipboard.


    I tried with my own user and original OMV admin. Also rebooting the whole machine did not help.

    Both binaries k3s and kubectl are available on CLI (via SSH).

    Hello. As you set the thread to solved immediately, I am not sure if it is still relevant for you.


    Anyways:

    Please post the content of /etc/smartd.conf.

    Code
    DEFAULT -a -o on -S on -T permissive -W 0,50,55 -n never,q
    /dev/disk/by-id/ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_4TB_xxx \
      -m mail@mydomain.de -M exec /usr/share/smartmontools/smartd-runner
    
    
    /dev/disk/by-id/nvme-WD_BLACK_SN770M_2TB_xxx -d nvme \
      -m mail@mydomain.de -M exec /usr/share/smartmontools/smartd-runner


    Do you have configured default values for all devices?

    I think so.


    The configuration is generated according this https://github.com/openmediava…es/etc-smartd_conf.j2#L17


    -W DIFF[,INFO[,CRIT]] critical temp is setting from UI + 5 degrees, so this is correct. The UI setting is the INFO value. See https://linux.die.net/man/5/smartd.conf

    Thank you for looking up and sharing the insights. But how does this make sense from a user perspective? When I select 50° C in the GUI, then I expect to get a notification when reaching 50° C, not 55. I kindly suggest to adjust openmediavault's way to process the data.


    Another issue I encountered on a fresh openmediavault (version 7.6.0-1) this morning:


    One drive's temperature on the dashboard is 37° C. I turned on temperature monitoring and set it to 50° C.

    openmediavault sent me a mail immediately telling:


    Quote

    The following warning/error was logged by the smartd daemon:


    Device: /dev/disk/by-id/nvme-WD_BLACK_SN770M_2TB_xxx, Temperature 56 Celsius reached critical limit of 55 Celsius (Min/Max ??/56)

    Executing smartctl -a shows:


    So there seem to be two temp sensors on the drive. openmediavault's dashboard shows the Temperature or sensor 1's value? But smartd daemon watches sensor 2 and throws the alert accordingly?


    Thanks

    Hi, is this a bug in the GUI?


    I turned on S.M.A.R.T. temperature monitoring and set the maximum to 50°C:




    E-Mail notifications are turned on.


    After applying the S.M.A.R.T. settings I received this email:



    The message does refer to a 55 Celsius maximum. So it does look like the selection list in the GUI is mismatched.

    On my system?


    IP is set to static in my modem prefs so yeh always the same ip (the pi was not getting an IP at all)

    Sure it makes sense to set a static IP for servers. Nevertheless there are also other ways to fix the IP. E.g. I can setup my DHCP server to always provide the same IP to a certain MAC address. Or you can work with the hostnames in your network, not with IP addresses at all.


    So it looks for me that the issue does only occur when setting a static IP. DHCP setups are not affected.

    The problem here was that many systems have been using an old configuration for ages. In the course of time, however, changes in the kernel and UDEV have resulted in the device names now being completely different than they were back then. These were changes over which the OMV project has no influence.

    P.S. Wouldn't it make sense to warn about a certain risk of 'braking changes' in the Blog and how to fix it in the case of emergency? At least for the 7.5.0 update.


    Blog | openmediavault


    When updating Home Assistant e.g., I have the feeling that the list of braking changes is longer than the actual improvements. :D

    Hey!


    I am new to OMV. I have a lot of experience with Bash, so a fix like this wouldn't be a problem for me. But since I specifically chose a ready-made system like OMV to obtain a certain level of reliability, I wonder: How often do such showstoppers occur?