Posts by belierzz
-
-
-
All,
I made a fresh OMV 7 installation today. All running as expected, besides the error messages I receive e.g. with omv-upgrade as my predecessor within this thread:
Code
Display Moreroot@supermicro:~# omv-upgrade Get:1 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives InRelease Ign:1 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives InRelease Get:2 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Release Ign:2 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Release Get:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Err:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Method gave a blank filename Get:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Err:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Method gave a blank filename Get:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Err:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Method gave a blank filename Get:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Err:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Method gave a blank filename Get:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Err:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Method gave a blank filename Get:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Err:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Method gave a blank filename Get:3 file:/var/cache/openmediavault/archives Packages Hit:4 http://packages.openmediavault.org/public sandworm InRelease Hit:5 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm InRelease Hit:6 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bookworm-security InRelease Hit:7 http://download.proxmox.com/debian/pve bookworm InRelease Hit:8 http://deb.debian.org/debian bookworm-updates InRelease Hit:9 https://openmediavault.github.io/packages sandworm InRelease Hit:10 https://download.docker.com/linux/debian bookworm InRelease Hit:11 https://openmediavault-plugin-developers.github.io/packages/debian sandworm InRelease Hit:12 http://httpredir.debian.org/debian bookworm-backports InRelease Reading package lists... Done Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done Calculating upgrade... Done 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.I tried all the hints in this thread (via OMVEXTRAS as well as omv-firstaid), but no luck. I have nothing like a dietpi installation here, just installed the Debian 12.12 netinst iso and took advantage of the installation script found on wiki.omv-extras.org.
Thanks in advance!
-
-
writecache is still installed, output as follows:
Code
Display More/var/cache/apt/archives/omvwc_subdir_t1 /var/cache/apt/archives/omvwc_subdir_t2 /var/cache/samba/omvwc_subdir_t1 /var/cache/samba/omvwc_subdir_t2 /var/lib/openmediavault/rrd/omvwc_subdir_t1 /var/lib/openmediavault/rrd/omvwc_subdir_t2 /var/lib/apt/lists/omvwc_subdir_t1 /var/lib/apt/lists/omvwc_subdir_t2 /var/lib/rrdcached/omvwc_subdir_t1 /var/lib/rrdcached/omvwc_subdir_t2 /var/lib/monit/omvwc_subdir_t1 /var/lib/monit/omvwc_subdir_t2 /var/lib/dpkg/updates/omvwc_subdir_t1 /var/lib/dpkg/updates/omvwc_whiteout_1760858159.txt /var/lib/dpkg/updates/omvwc_whiteout_1760883916.txt /var/lib/dpkg/updates/omvwc_subdir_t2 /var/lib/dpkg/updates/omvwc_whiteout_1760966044.txt /var/log/omvwc_subdir_t1 /var/log/omvwc_subdir_t2 /var/tmp/omvwc_subdir_t1 /var/tmp/omvwc_subdir_t2 -
ryecoaaron fyi: I have made a server reboot, but the messages still appear with "omv-upgrade".
-
All,
I made a new installation and installed the writecache plugin the first time (instead of flashmemory). So far, so good.
From apticron (as well as if performing omv-upgrade), I receive the following messages:W: Problem unlinking the file omvwc_subdir_t1 - pkgAcquire::Clean (21: Is a directory)
W: Problem unlinking the file omvwc_subdir_t2 - pkgAcquire::Clean (21: Is a directory)
I assume, these messages are related to the writecache plugin. But also de-installation does not help to get rid of the messages. Seems to be no bigger issue after all, but maybe ryecoaaron is interested in corr. feedback to this new plugin.
Thanks and regards,
belierzz
-
-
-
Out of curiosity:
I'm wondering about the possibilty of live backups of the root system via the backup plugin. In all literature it is recommended to unmount the disc before the backup. This is obviously not the case during the backup (ddfulldisk) with the a.m. plugin.
Is this a reliable backup solution or is it recommended to do the backup "offline", i.e. Clonezilla or similar? Thanks for a heads-up in adavance...
-
Good morning,
same situation here after last update to 7.4.12-3.
-
-
Good morning votdev
Here the output (with obvious double entry):
Code
Display More[ { "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/usb-ATA_Samsung_SSD_860_0123456789ABCDE-0:0", "devicetype": "", "enable": true, "tempdiff": 0, "tempmax": 0, "uuid": "f08a0860-7e9f-4cff-a9fe-c3d5b721e3cb" }, { "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/usb-SanDisk_Ultra_Fit_4C530001080405112111-0:0", "devicetype": "", "enable": false, "tempdiff": 0, "tempmax": 0, "uuid": "b545229f-9890-4095-9cd3-52e2159a3806" }, { "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/nvme-CT1000P3SSD8_2318E6D1CF5F", "devicetype": "nvme", "enable": true, "tempdiff": 0, "tempmax": 0, "uuid": "7adda958-9c23-4b18-8204-de825a04e025" }, { "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-WDC_WD80EFBX-68AZZN0_VR2WYL6K", "devicetype": "", "enable": false, "tempdiff": 0, "tempmax": 0, "uuid": "f15e9c07-e5d3-469b-afad-a3f012076e5f" }, { "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-WDC_WD60EFRX-68L0BN1_WD-WX31D97LP09Y", "devicetype": "", "enable": true, "tempdiff": 0, "tempmax": 0, "uuid": "d2285faa-b4df-4c43-bd29-532d16c00204" }, { "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST8000NT001-3LZ101_WRQ20HCV", "devicetype": "", "enable": false, "tempdiff": 0, "tempmax": 0, "uuid": "2fd244e3-b50f-4837-8b59-851d0c2ca58e" }, { "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST8000NT001-3LZ101_WRQ20HCV", "devicetype": "", "enable": true, "tempdiff": 0, "tempmax": 0, "uuid": "8bf0248c-0a38-4549-b2dc-64c464ce81db" }, { "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST8000NT001-3LZ101_WWZ40V0B", "devicetype": "", "enable": true, "tempdiff": 0, "tempmax": 0, "uuid": "2d062b8d-4c8c-4ce8-8086-6e6ee75e4a29" } ]Thanks for your helping hand.
-
As soon as I want to enable SMART monitoring for the a.m. HDD, I still receive the initial error message and need to revert. Temp is monitored correctly, it is just the impossibility to activate SMART in the GUI.
-
Thanks for your swift reply. Pls find attached the requested output (else, "message too long" error).smartmon.txt
-
-
I have 2x the same disk type inside, but with different serials
Code
Display More{ "aam": 0, "apm": 128, "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST8000NT001-3LZ101_WWZ40V0B", "spindowntime": 0, "uuid": "ed09eaa2-7e0d-49a3-bb83-8ae63a35b8bd", "writecache": true }, { "aam": 0, "apm": 128, "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST8000NT001-3LZ101_WRQ20HCV", "spindowntime": 0, "uuid": "615b47e2-6133-435c-b230-1dbfea26ccf8", "writecache": true }Therefore I do not see a double entry?!
-
Thanks a bunch, votdev
Here you go:
Code
Display Moreroot@raspberrypi:~# omv-confdbadm read --prettify conf.system.hdparm [ { "aam": 0, "apm": 0, "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/mmc-SPCC_0x00015148", "spindowntime": 0, "uuid": "fcc55c75-8b68-49bc-8736-b9966c3ad68f", "writecache": true }, { "aam": 0, "apm": 0, "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/usb-SanDisk_Ultra_Fit_4C530001080405112111-0:0", "spindowntime": 0, "uuid": "58432c63-52b8-41c3-9073-f9c924d93427", "writecache": false }, { "aam": 0, "apm": 0, "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/usb-ATA_Samsung_SSD_860_0123456789ABCDE-0:0", "spindowntime": 0, "uuid": "b7dc0c4d-5c79-4e51-b7c5-750c8edeb53d", "writecache": true }, { "aam": 0, "apm": 0, "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/nvme-CT1000P3SSD8_2318E6D1CF5F", "spindowntime": 0, "uuid": "ac2dfd35-247c-4456-b79e-30a56602d01b", "writecache": true }, { "aam": 0, "apm": 128, "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-WDC_WD80EFBX-68AZZN0_VR2WYL6K", "spindowntime": 0, "uuid": "48be7c99-1318-419c-a1e0-6bbb7ec9019b", "writecache": true }, { "aam": 0, "apm": 0, "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/mmc-SPCC_0x7270000e", "spindowntime": 0, "uuid": "f87bc3b4-ae72-4b32-a8e7-21e3458e64ea", "writecache": true }, { "aam": 0, "apm": 128, "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST8000NT001-3LZ101_WWZ40V0B", "spindowntime": 0, "uuid": "ed09eaa2-7e0d-49a3-bb83-8ae63a35b8bd", "writecache": true }, { "aam": 0, "apm": 1, "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-WDC_WD60EFRX-68L0BN1_WD-WX31D97LP09Y", "spindowntime": 248, "uuid": "ef3e6a23-ba73-4edf-b5cb-285a99e97a42", "writecache": true }, { "aam": 0, "apm": 128, "devicefile": "/dev/disk/by-id/ata-ST8000NT001-3LZ101_WRQ20HCV", "spindowntime": 0, "uuid": "615b47e2-6133-435c-b230-1dbfea26ccf8", "writecache": true } ] -
Hi everybody,
I have used a Seagate IronWolf Pro HDD for backup purposes in OMV 7 on a Raspberry Pi 5. No issues. Now I want to use this HDD as internal storage.
If I try to enable SMART for the device, I get the following error with "conflicting ID":
Can anyone tell me where resp. in which file I can fix the issue?
Thanks for your support!
-
Hi,
enable the docker repository as shown in your screenshot and install the "compose" plugin. There you will find all the neccessary for your docker setup.
