Beiträge von OpenMediaVault

    How is it going? Any news regarding this uber-necessery plug-in?

    • Is it already compatible with omv 3?


    And this one is important too :P

    • "Create encryption" should offer partitions (/dev/sda1) not only the entire disk (/dev/sda) #12


    https://github.com/OpenMediaVa…-luksencryption/issues/12


    I don't use btsync... I'm just using syncthing.


    I now did grep syncthing /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*


    Code
    /etc/apt/sources.list.d/omv-extras-org-stoneburner.list:# syncthing repo
    /etc/apt/sources.list.d/omv-extras-org-stoneburner.list:deb http://apt.syncthing.net/ syncthing release


    which looks good for me. But I don't get any(!) updates offered over the webfrontend?


    I did a apt-get update and apt-get upgrade
    and now I'm back in business with syncthing v0.13.5 :)


    Beside that the webfrontend stays empty I also have this error via apt-get update


    Code
    W: A error occurred during the signature verification. The repository is not updated and the previous index files will be used. GPG error: http://apt.spideroak.com release Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 573E3D1C51AE1XYZ
    
    
    W: Failed to fetch http://apt.spideroak.com/ubuntu-spideroak-hardy/dists/release/Release


    In total it means I can safely disable the obsolete bt-sync repo and keep receiving updates for syncthing?


    Thank's for you help! I'm already heavily syncing again! :thumbup:


    That is the repo omv-extras has been using for over a year. My test system is on 0.13.4 with no changes.


    On OMV 2.x, if you disable the btsync repo, you disable the syncthing repo. Therefore, no updates.


    I don't get it. I have the btsync repo enabled because syncthing remains in there. I installed syncthing this way.


    Am I right that there are no updates coming anymore for the btsync repo (=syncthing repo) for OMV 2.x?


    Can I substitute it by disabling the btsync repo in OMV and manual add the official syncthing release channel from apt.syncthing.net?


    Will it keep my settings? And will it update seamless?

    on my omv is v0.12.15, Linux (64 bit) installed .. wft?!?!


    For my Linux workstations I use the the release channel provided by syncthing: https://apt.syncthing.net/



    ...it's running with v.0.13...


    Maybe this would be the right one for OMV?


    Before there was the plugin for OMV I used to use the "manual" way above... but with all restrictions (no gui integration in OMV/no easy setup/...)


    Would be nice if we get an update here ;)

    OMV: Syncthing 0.12.21
    Arch: Syncthing 0.12.21
    Android: Syncthing 0.12.20
    Have you guys noticed we've got the brand newest available version on OMV + a web ui plugin to manage it easily?-)


    Just realized that syncing via syncthing doesn't work with omv anymore! This is since the middle of may I realized.

    I know why now!
    All my clients (linux/mac/win/android) went automatically up to Syncthing v0.13.4 without interaction! The OMV-Syncthing-Plugin remains at v0.12.22, this is why they can't communicate anymore and syncing stopped working. :(


    Any news when the update arrives for OMV? Good Day!

    Thank's for debian, thank's for omv, thanks for syncthing!


    I have one question:


    I installed syncthing via the repo. The tab syncthing is showing in omv under services.


    Here I can "Add user" and define instances for each of them. But I don't know the mechanism behind it. Is one instance of syncthing running per user? And how can I keep them apart? just with the port number?

    I would like that each of the user has it's own instance on the server. But as far as I see syncthing is ignoring the user & passwords from omv...


    What is the best practice here? And how is the system theoretically working?


    Greetings!


    PS.: Can't post without allowing scripts from google.com (don't be evil!). Bad day! :thumbdown:

    Luks works over block devices, under fs. So raid first,encryption later, fs at the end.


    This sounds pretty simple. Thank's for the instructions. Is it possible to handle this 3 steps:

    • Create RAID
    • Create LUKS
    • Create FILESYSTEM
    • PROFIT!

    via the OMV Web interface? Still waiting for my HW to be delivered so I can't test it right now ;)


    The unlocking should work with the web interface. Does anyone know if there is a permission management to allow ("normal")-users to unlock the LUKS? :love:


    Thank's!

    Read here
    <a href="http://forums.openmediavault.org/index.php/Thread/11592-LUKS-disk-encryption-plugin/">LUKS disk encryption plugin</a>


    Hi subzero,
    thank's I read this before.


    My question is more about the setup. I have installed omv already on some machines but I never came in touch with the build in raid function.
    There is different ways to go as far as I can tell.


    What would be the Setup in particular?:


    1. Install OMV
    Setup RAID <-> Setup LUKS ?
    ...
    PROFIT! :D

    Hello Everyone!


    Just thinking what is the best way to encrypt my data on a 24x7 NAS-Solution via OMV. It should work as a disaster minimizer after a theft. If somebody takes the device (=power off) the data should be not accessible.


    The way to unlock should be easy to do like plugging in a usb-device (with a keyfile) before boot or using the web interface and unlock the disk-array via a pass phrase.


    I'm planning to use a little flash-storage for the omv-system and a software-raid (provided by omv) with two disks.


    I already read some lecture:


    The easier thing to do should be to "just" encrypt the data-raid via luks. Is there something like a best practice or is it trial and error?


    Thanks for great piece of software released under FOSS! Great work! :)