MarcS Intermediate
- Member since Jun 21st 2019
- Last Activity:
- Posts
- 300
- Reactions Received
- 4
- Points
- 1,944
- Profile Hits
- 6,724
-
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 5.x Owncloud: Lots of weird entries in log: "systemd run-docker-runtime/...mount: succeeded".Post(Quote from davidh2k)
Hi - I have exactly the same problem on a rpi4. The link above is now closed and no real solution was found.
I do have performance issues especially with my Nextcloud container.
Have you seen any new developments that would resolve the… -
MarcS
Posted the thread OMV 5.x Docker on BTFRS.ThreadHas anyone here installed Docker on an BTRFS filesystem?
I have massive issues with syslog filling up when Docker containers are running. -
MarcS
Replied to the thread EXT4, ZFS or something else.PostI have used ZFS RAIDZ1 (=RAID5) for 2 years. Works really well, has a OMV plugin and is reliable.
I added an SDD for Logging and Caching which added to performance.
I dont feel any significant performance drop from ext4 and the benefits are plenty as you… -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 4.x Docker on BTFRS very large subvolumes.Postthanks. That's an interesting article which explains the differences in reporting free space under "normal tools" and BTRFS.
According to the article, normal tools show too much free space and BTRFS is actually pretending to be full.
This however is not my… -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 4.x Docker on BTFRS very large subvolumes.PostYes - this seems reasonable. Why is there such a difference to above numbers?
(Code, 5 lines) -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 4.x Docker on BTFRS very large subvolumes.PostA few but in total they only show around 3.2GB.
(Code, 10 lines) -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 4.x Docker on BTFRS very large subvolumes.Postthank you ! I tried and it does show slightly lower numbers but still 23GB which seems very high.
(Code, 2 lines) -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 4.x Docker on BTFRS very large subvolumes.Post -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 4.x Docker on BTFRS very large subvolumes.Post(Quote from raulfg3)
I did this but it released only 10MB. I am still surprised that 35GB are used up by Nextcloud and Nginx (no data on Nextcloud) -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 4.x Docker on BTFRS very large subvolumes.PostI check the space with Midnight Commander. It gives me the size of the folder /mnt/dockerfiles/btrfs/subvolumes -
MarcS
Reaction (Post)try docker system prune --volumes
and revise if free space -
MarcS
Reaction (Post)How did you check the space consumption? Docker uses BTRFS subvolumes/snapshots a lot when building container layers.
Maybe this article might help you: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/…almost_nothing_into_it.21 -
MarcS
Posted the thread OMV 5.x Dell workstation -> server.ThreadHello all, has anyone turned a Dell Precision T55xx, 56xx or 58xxx Workstation
into an OMV server?
I am in particular interested in SATA controller performance (non-RAID) and if people have swapped the inbuilt Sata controllers for any recommended 3rd party… -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 0.5 New device visible but not usable.PostA reboot fixed the above issues. I believe there may have been some incorrect OMV references somewhere.
However, now I am getting new issues on both drives mentioned above in the Syslog. Maybe anyone has seen this before:
"Dependency failed for filesystem… -
MarcS
Posted the thread OMV 4.x Docker on BTFRS very large subvolumes.ThreadI have Docker installed on a BTFRS filesystem and found massive amount of data in "dockerfiles/btfrs/subvolumes". In total there are 36GB used by Docker in this one sub-folder.
I only run Nextcloud and Nginx on Docker and Nextcloud has zero data stored… -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 0.5 New device visible but not usable.PostI have another OMV server (4.1.36-1) which also developed HD issues. Do you think they are related?
OMV writes this message into my syslog every 30 seconds:
Jan 11 12:42:58 OMV monit[2764]: 'mountpoint_srv_dev-disk-by-label-EncExt3600GB' status failed (1)… -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 0.5 New device visible but not usable.PostOk, I think I might rather replace my controller to a model that is not JMicorn. -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 0.5 New device visible but not usable.Postbut the link which you shared says if I update, "JMIcron might break my configuration" -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 0.5 New device visible but not usable.PostHi - thanks for responding. I am using 5.5.21-1 and you are right, the added HD is a connected via USB3 and it uses a JMicron controller.
What shall I do? -
MarcS
Replied to the thread OMV 0.5 New device visible but not usable.Postno - i cant.
It wont even let me go onto SMART. The OMV window pops up with the mentioned error message.
Device....not found.
I know that OMV always had issues with detecting HD controllers correctly and everyone had to manually fix some stuff. I assumed…