I'm not a OMV dev nor am I a Linux expert but I know that it's not the best idea to run a NAS on a wireless connection. So that may be the reason for the initial missing wifi driver support.
If you really need the wifi drivers then it's probably best to temporarily use a wired connection and add wifi within the gui.
Beiträge von Stramm
-
-
At first I'd try a direct wired connection (eventually via a gbit switch if you do not have the necessary cable) to exclude the DLAN as culprit.
-
Ok, thanks for clarification. Then it's probably the best to start a new repo.
And thanks again for all your work...
-
When I try to add an existing borg repo to the plugin I get errors, creating a new however works without issues.
May I assume that adding existing repos isn't supported so far? -
I haven't been able to see any problems in your config... if you want to, I can upload mine. It's working despite of having the Feature-Policy.
How to modify the CSP is described in the manual
https://docs.nextcloud.com/ser…e-content-security-policy -
-
Wenn Du unbedingt NC auf der Systempartition haben willst, wirst Du das Ganze manuell konfigurieren müssen (ohne Plugin). Hierzu https://openmediavault.readthe…atest/various/advset.html
In /etc/nginx/sites_available, sites_enabled wirst Du nichts erstellen können, da hier immer wieder mal von OMV überschrieben wird. Wie im obigen Link beschrieben musst Du in /usr/share/openmediavault/mkconf/nginx.d Deine config erstellen.
Weiter kann ich Dir da nicht helfen, hab das noch nicht gemacht. Ich kann nur nochmals Docker empfehlen. -
Ahh, OK verstehe. Dann klappt das nicht so trivial (wg. Nginx Plugin).
Was spricht denn dagegen, das NC Programmverzeichnis neben das Dataverzeichnis zu setzen. Und wie oben schon geschrieben, was spricht gegen Docker? -
Und warum nicht docker? Würde ich nochmals Nextcloud installieren, dann würde ich einen docker container nehmen.
-
Modifizierst Du halt den Pfad für Deine Zwecke.
Wo hast Du denn da Probleme?
-
Nimm doch die Anleitung aus dem verlinkten Thread aus dem hiesigen Forum. Danach klappt das wenigstens. Gen Threadende findest Du auch eine aktuelle Nginx config. Die Älteren funktionieren nicht mehr.
Und bzgl. Deines Wunschpfades... musst Dich ja nicht sklavisch an die Anleitung halten. Modifizierst Du halt den Pfad für Deine Zwecke.Edit: Auch wenn Du Nginx unbedingt in /var/www/ installieren willst, den Datenordner würde ich wie beschrieben auf eine andere HD legen.
-
-
Amazing, thanks a lot. It's working like a charm and website delivery is a lot faster now with http2 (verified in FF dev console that it's really enabled
)
You're the best
-
I'd like to suggest a function for the nginx plugin... a http2 enabler within the server tab so that the generated nginx config has the http2 in the listen command.
Would be great as multiplexing may increase site delivery.Thanks for conisdering this and sorry if it's rude to ask.
-
Warum per PN? Ist doch ein öffentliches Forum und alle könnten daraus lernen.
Und was ist jetzt so speziell bei Deinem Setup? Ist halt ein Apollo Lake Board (Atom Nachfolger) (aktuellstes J4205) mit SSD an USB und 4SATA Discs? Hab das auch und ebenfalls mit dem Node 304. Trotzdem sollte man dazusagen, daß ECC nicht unterstützt wird.
-
kannst ja mal versuchen
sudo systemctl start nginx
wenn nginx nicht starten will, gibt es einge Hinweise in der Meldung bzw. welche weiteren Tools Du ausführen kannst, um mehr Infos zu erhalten (journalctl)sudo systemctl status nginx
zeigt den aktuellen Status von nginx anwenn Dein eingelogter User nicht in der sudoers group ist, kannst Du evtl. mit su zu root werden.
-
Evtl. mal versuchen, RSync nicht über Dienste -> RSync zu verwenden, sondern RSync über die System -> Geplanten Aufgaben als root ausführen. Hier müss man den RSync Befehl leider händisch zusammenstellen.
-
@henfri
If you use rsanpshot in the rsync way for media files, then it's no protection from bitrot as they do not change and you only have one copy in your backup folder. Butwho cares as bitrot is not a (huge) problem for media files.Edit: Nevermind... of course rsnapshot protects from bitrot... facepalm
-
@henfri
I do not understand your rant against rsync. Both, rsync and rsnapshot have advantages and scenarios where they are best used. Imho rsync is excellent for data that doesn't change often (especially media files like movies, photos and music). Rsnapshot is excellent for documents cause of the versioning.
A real live example from some days ago:
My wife cleaned up here Documents folder including the folder "Photobooks". She thought it was a duplicate and deleted it. But it was not.
She told me about this in the evening - after the weekly backup had run.So, if I had the simple rsync solution, the content of here Documents folder would have been mirrored onto the backup drive -without the folder "Photobooks". Everything would have been gone.
But I do not have this simple solution, but a versioned backup using rsnapshot. This way I could use the backup from last week and restore from that.That's plain wrong. By default rsync doesn't delete in the target folder. So if you delete files in your source, they are still existing after your weekly sync in your target folder. If you want another behavior you have to knowingly set this option. Your wife would still have her photos in her backup folder.
If the Family-Hotos are lost, even a newbie will be able to restore with that help -and if it is by paying 50$ to a pro. With the rsync option, it would need a professional data recovery company and around1000$With rsync you have a plain copy of your source. So why would I have the need for a data recovery company for 1000$?
If you're not familiar with the console, just make your backup folder a smb share and you can handle the data from your win box. No compressed stuff or containers... a simple copy. If you're not afraid of the console cp source target and you're done.Don't get me wrong, I'm new to OMV and for sure I don't intend to offend you or anyone else in this forum. I have to say this cause I know my english is far from perfect and always sounds somehow harsh.
Still rsync works pretty smooth for me.Thomas
-
I have to admit that I bought the 4205 cause the 3455 was out of stock. Usually patience is not one of my strength so I swallowed the pill and invested 15€ more. And the little advantage of the 4205 isn't worth the money.
Edit: I see the difference in Italy is even bigger. So it's totally pointless to go for the 4205.