Alles anzeigenIt seems that you have pre-determined that you will only have one pretty powerful NAS. Why is that? Why not more than one, and smaller? Perhaps even many more?
Also you say nothing about the backup method you intend to use, but quite a lot about RAID. I would argue that the backup system should take priority over what, if any, RAID you intend to use. A good backup system, with extremely high combined bandwidth, can be built using more than one separate NAS. And if RAID is used (as I suspect it often is) instead of a good backup system, rethinking this might make RAID unnecessary and could even improve the final system. Cost, performance, stability, data integrity and redundancy.
Using separate units you can have some that are specially designed for data storage and some that are specially designed for processing and/or streaming. And even some that are specially designed for backup data storage. And you could even run distributed workloads, other than backups.
Using several smaller units it is easy to expand. You simply add more units as needed. If you have several identical units you can also get nice hardware redundancy. I use Odroid HC2s with 12 TB Ironwolf HDDs.
Also transcoding on-the-fly may be nice, but is really only needed for live content. You could easily share more than one version of the video, in different formats/bandwidths. And re-encode it in advance with much higher quality and compression than on-the-fly transcoding is capable of. You might even run several instances of plex/emby for different versions of the media for clients with different bandwidth capabilities.
thanks for the tips....
I had not thought about the possibility of creating more small systems and I will certainly study the possibility.
surely at the moment I have two problems in mind this this option
first, the cost is certainly greater, second, my space available is not very much, indicatively 60x60x60cm.