Beiträge von savellm

Enabled that and tried it again, nope...

How do I do that? Or add that?

I have port forwarding on and that should be working. But its not getting that far.

This seems to be a nginx or container issue where its not starting the web server.

So hitting the container is doing nothing. Its just not responding. So either a broken network to the container or something else.

No but like I say I can even get the container to provide the default page via the IP address.

Just tested on mobile and nope.

Same thing

So I'm pulling my hair out here.

I'm trying to get Linuxserver/Letsencrypt to work with Portainer.

I started off by creating a new network: 'docker network create proxy'

Then I setup Linuxserver/Letsencrypt -> Port 1443 -> 443

Network IP Address Gateway MAC Address Actions

proxy 172.19.0.2 172.19.0.1

I have Server ready in the container, and I can see the cert in /letsencrypt/live

My port forward from router (pfsense) takes https to server:1443

If I click on server IP 10.0.0.9:1443 I get 'This site can’t be reached'

If I try one of my forwarded domains, I get 'This site can’t be reached'

If I try any other containers it works, ie without trying https://subdomain

Just 10.0.0.9:6789 for instance, works fine on the same proxy network.

I would expect just clicking on 10.0.0.9:1443 or 10.0.0.9:443 I would get that 'Welcome to our server' message.

Network from Portainer side:

Please can someone point out where I'm going wrong?

Environment settings:

Hey @crashtest
What about using these attributes?
ashift=12
aclinherit=passthrough
acltype=posixacl
xattr=sa
set compression=lz4
atime=off

These are what I have gathered around here, do they make good use sense?

Cheers will do

ashift=12 creates the correct alignment for 4k sector disks.

Thats pretty much most/all modern drives right. I am using WD Red 8tb's.
So this would be a good setting to use right?

So far:
ashift=12
aclinherit=passthrough
acltype=posixacl
xattr=sa
set compression=lz4
atime=off

Is this a good/best setup for a new ZFS pool?

Zitat von Blabla

Hi,
I installed OMV 5 and Proxmox kernel. I wanted to create a ZFS pool with 3 disks. The issue is that the device list is empty so I can't create the pool. Do you know how can I make ZFS see sdc,sdd and sde?

Make sure your drives are wiped and clean to show up in the UI.

Nice thanks, can you explain all of that?
Also did you get this from Proxmox or somewhere?

Hi all,
So setting up ZFS but noticed that most/all attributes arent set or are and just wondering if they are right?
Eg Compression=off
I set it to =lz4

Just wondering if there is anything else that should be set for a good new ZFS install?

Please do not use USB drives in a RAID config. Only bad things will ensue.
Read the very many forum posts on people running into issues with this config of RAID with USB drives.

If anything shuck the drives out of the containers and use proper SATA connections.

So I'm in a bit of a conundrum, I don't HAVE to move to OMV just yet.
I want to because im impatient, but I don't have to.

I know dev said it'll be out ASAP in Jan and that's all good. Even if it takes another 6 months.
But my feeling is 2 fold.
1) If I go with OMV now run v5 get it all setup and data moved to it, they they release v5 and for whatever reason you cant upgrade to stable release, is this likely?
2) I go now with OMV v5, and then they release v6 stable shortly and skip v5. I would think I should do a clean install for best results and least issues?

I can stay on my current solution with unRAID, but I'd like to use OMV with ZFS. I can wait, but like I say, im impatient.
Just wondering the best course of action here.

Definitely ZFS for me with my 18 drives.

Thanks bud for the help/support.

I'll get playing tonight on my test box.

Yeah sorry maybe I didnt write it clearly.
I meant expanding my pool by adding a new vdev, not expanding a vdev.
So I'll start with 1x vdev and 1x pool, and then when I move my other half of my drives over I'll add the drives to a new vdev and expand that 1 pool, and it will then have 2x vdev.

Seems like I have a game plan.

LOL @ryecoaaron can you unblock my last post.
I messed up the linking URL, fixed it but post needs to be approved

Right now I'm using unRAID.
But my single drive perf is starting to hinder me more than help.
Hence why im on the search for something better/else. And I really like ZFS and with OpenZFS on the horizon I thought it would be a good choice.

Let me find the expansion for you.
EDIT: Found it: Expanding Pool

Zitat von ryecoaaron

zfs can't do that yet but even when it can, it isn't the best implementation in my opinion.

I believe this can be done on FreeNAS to expand a pool.
Reason why I asked is to save my data I'm going to use half my drives to backup the data. Create a new pool, move my data to it, and then add in the other half my drives after the fact.

Containers have moved to use Portainer. I am not sure if you can copy over or use the current settings.
BUT I have not tried this myself or know if there is actually any difference, just pointing it out.