What kernel are you running?
Beiträge von freebsd
-
-
This doesn't apply to ZFS. When you name the pool, with default settings, the mount point is the name of the pool. Generally, this location will be at the root of the boot drive. (In my case the pool names is /ZFS1 )
The only thing that comes to mine, regarding Dockers and ZFS, is that you don't want to store Docker images and containers on a ZFS drive filesystem. Docker uses overlayfs which past versions of ZFS interpreted as being legacy filesystem clones.
Since you're booting from an SSD, it would be best to keep your Docker images and containers there, in the default location.
In OMV4, the default Docker location is /var/lib/dockerok. I will have to investigate how much data this filesystem (/var/lib/docker)uses since I only have 120GB ssd for my OMV base. I assume the "volumes" can still be stored on my zpool.
-
Hello,
I am not sure if this is the right place to ask this question. I tried to search in the forums but cannot seem to find the answer.
I have been using OMV for backup purposes only for about a year now and I decided to consolidated my home server inside OMV.
I upgraded to OMV 5 and added a ZFS mirrored disk. I have the OMV base files on an SSD and all my data on the ZFS pool.
I went ahead and added docker and kvm and pretty much everything seems to be working but . . .
I ran into the "common problem" that people experience with the shared folders not saving. see attached.
I am not sure if its related to my docker setup but I read a post that the recommendation is to use the "srv" mounts for the volumes in the container.
I don't see this in ZFS. I am not sure if my I have my ZFS + docker setup is correct. I also noticed that docker is creating a zfs mount for the graph.
omvstor1/8bb66d1f5d4d3c0f8f101eedc257090225bb64f16d7844e6078e5f933600eadb on /sharedfolders/docker/zfs/graph/8bb66d1f5d4d3c0f8f101eedc257090225bb64f16d7844e6078e5f933600eadb type zfs (rw,relatime,xattr,noacl)setup:
{
"data-root": "/omvstor1/dockerFiles"
}Linux openmediavault.devsphoto.com 5.3.13-1-pve #1 SMP PVE 5.3.13-1 (Thu, 05 Dec 2019 07:18:14 +0100) x86_64 GNU/Linux
-
apparmor should be installed if you use the netinstall image and install minimal debian or if you use the armbian/raspbian images.
Is apparmor only required by Debian for installation purposes to verify packages or is this even needed moving forward?
-
I have the same issue and I googled forever but I could not find the solution finally I looked at the logs and I saw that Apparmor was blocking the network connection for portainer. Hopefully this helps others.
Might be a good idea to remove apparmor on the OMV 5 install script just in case.