Beiträge von ryecoaaron

    Don't edit files. Read all of these steps.


    create a self signed cert in the omv web interface.

    set that cert for the omv web interface

    sudo omv-showkey sslcertificate

    get the uuid for the cert you created

    Then run my script https://github.com/ryecoaaron/scripts/blob/main/update_cert.sh


    update_cert.sh b11bfa4e-11dc-4e49-a450-9fee0d786702 cert.pem privkey.pem letsencrypt


    You can set this same command as a hook script to run every time the script is renewed and the web interface will use your cert. I use this will all of my omv systems except I am using acme.sh to get a wildcard cert.

    Or any other method that would keep multiple snapshots on the usb storage?

    But, how can it be suddenly wrong? It was fine all the time...

    It looks like you used autocompose almost 3 years ago to create this compose file. Docker compose does change over time with updates. This was not caused by the plugin.


    remove this line:
    org.opencontainers.image.created: 2022-10-28T23:26:40-05:00



    I would actually remove a lot more lines but you probably don't have to. These are the lines I would get rid of:

    Neither the rsnapshot plugin nor the borgbackup plugin are designed to use a disk that is not mounted all the time. I started working on a borgusb plugin that was similar to the usbbackup plugin but used borg but never got far in it.


    You could use rsnapshot to backup to another location on your server. Then use the usbbackup plugin to sync that rsnapshot backup to the usb disk. I know it is additional space but extra backups are never bad.

    found that it grew from 4.27 to 4.33GB. That is a quite a jump

    60mb is a big jump? Probably just apt cache. apt-get clean or apt clean button in omv-extras will clear it.

    so what was remaining ~ 43GB on the original drive?. Is there a way to "clean-up" OMV system drive?

    probably logs and docker images. You would have to look at the drive to know.


    I have an OMV system that has been upgraded since OMV 4 and it is using 4.6G after all these years.

    Will you implement the fix described here on GitHub or do I need to do it as a workaround on my system? I would prefer to get it implemented in an official update. If I need to do it manually which file on my system, do I have to edit?

    When I push to github, that means it will be in the next release. And since there is nothing remotely dangerous about either of these issues, it is safe to wait for the release (probably in the next day).

    Ans also due to any reason it seems when you make an update of a container available for download (by pulling it again) you get a second entry in the Images list.

    Looking more at this, your screenshot is correct. If you pull a new image and restart your container to use it, you should see what your screenshot shows. You will see the latest image which your container is using and the old image that your container was using. Until your prune the images, the Images tab should show both. This tells you that you have images taking up space on your system and that they can be pruned since they are not in use.


    My system before prune


    After prune



    This change should fix the locally built image status showing failed.


    That is a smart error. There no way you wrote an exabyte to a 16gb msata disk. The write speed is too slow to write that much in decades.


    Hard to say if it is failing though. If the system is important, I would replace it. Otherwise, use omv-regen to create a backup. Just about any other backup method will clone bad sectors and/or corrupt files.

    there have been updates for the Docker Compose Plugin in OMV7 and there is a small bug in the tab Images in the WebGUI. For self-build containers (defined in the tab Dockerfiles) the status is set to failed now. This is confusing. In the past I could read there just n/a which was a better information.

    This status column and deduplication of the image list is a real pain. I will look at it but I think it is obvious that the plugin won't be able to get a status for a self-built image.

    Ans also due to any reason it seems when you make an update of a container available for download (by pulling it again) you get a second entry in the Images list.

    The newly pulled image has a different digest and isn't showing a tag. The code that deduplicates the image list thinks the image is a different tag. Just try to remember the plugin is using the output of docker image. So, this isn't a bug. It just is different than before for humans. I will see what I can do but not promising anything. I assume clicking the clear cache button on the Settings tab doesn't fix it?