I don't understand why I have problems accessing my NAS folders on Windows 11. I attach photos of the smb status... can anyone help me??
smb problem
-
can you post the error in a code box no one will reply if they are looking at a screenshot.
-
-
use a code box pal looks like this </>
what language is this pal?
-
-
use a code box pal looks like this </>
what language is this pal?
Code
Alles anzeigenDebian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by applicable law. Last login: Fri Jan 26 10:57:16 2024 from 192.168.2.221 root@nas:~# sudo systemctl status smbd.service ● smbd.service - Samba SMB Daemon Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/smbd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Fri 2024-01-26 11:09:52 CET; 1min 44s ago Docs: man:smbd(8) man:samba(7) man:smb.conf(5) Process: 1037 ExecStartPre=/usr/share/samba/update-apparmor-samba-profile (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Main PID: 1053 (smbd) Status: "smbd: ready to serve connections..." Tasks: 4 (limit: 9258) Memory: 105.4M CGroup: /system.slice/smbd.service ├─1053 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group ├─1304 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group ├─1305 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group └─3231 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group Jan 26 11:09:46 nas systemd[1]: Starting Samba SMB Daemon... Jan 26 11:09:52 nas systemd[1]: Started Samba SMB Daemon. Jan 26 11:09:52 nas smbd[1053]: [2024/01/26 11:09:52.195555, 0] ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:135(daemon_ready) Jan 26 11:09:52 nas smbd[1053]: daemon_ready: daemon 'smbd' finished starting up and ready to serve connections root@nas:~# systemctl status smbd ● smbd.service - Samba SMB Daemon Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/smbd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Fri 2024-01-26 11:09:52 CET; 2min 11s ago Docs: man:smbd(8) man:samba(7) man:smb.conf(5) Process: 1037 ExecStartPre=/usr/share/samba/update-apparmor-samba-profile (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Main PID: 1053 (smbd) Status: "smbd: ready to serve connections..." Tasks: 4 (limit: 9258) Memory: 105.4M CGroup: /system.slice/smbd.service ├─1053 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group ├─1304 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group ├─1305 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group └─3231 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group Jan 26 11:09:46 nas systemd[1]: Starting Samba SMB Daemon... Jan 26 11:09:52 nas systemd[1]: Started Samba SMB Daemon. Jan 26 11:09:52 nas smbd[1053]: [2024/01/26 11:09:52.195555, 0] ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:135(daemon_ready) Jan 26 11:09:52 nas smbd[1053]: daemon_ready: daemon 'smbd' finished starting up and ready to serve connections root@nas:~# systemctl status smbd ● smbd.service - Samba SMB Daemon Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/smbd.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Fri 2024-01-26 11:09:52 CET; 2min 19s ago Docs: man:smbd(8) man:samba(7) man:smb.conf(5) Process: 1037 ExecStartPre=/usr/share/samba/update-apparmor-samba-profile (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Main PID: 1053 (smbd) Status: "smbd: ready to serve connections..." Tasks: 4 (limit: 9258) Memory: 105.4M CGroup: /system.slice/smbd.service ├─1053 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group ├─1304 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group ├─1305 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group └─3231 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group Jan 26 11:09:46 nas systemd[1]: Starting Samba SMB Daemon... Jan 26 11:09:52 nas systemd[1]: Started Samba SMB Daemon. Jan 26 11:09:52 nas smbd[1053]: [2024/01/26 11:09:52.195555, 0] ../../lib/util/become_daemon.c:135(daemon_ready) Jan 26 11:09:52 nas smbd[1053]: daemon_ready: daemon 'smbd' finished starting up and ready to serve connections root@nas:~# systemctl status nmbd.service ● nmbd.service - Samba NMB Daemon Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/nmbd.service; disabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: inactive (dead) Docs: man:nmbd(8) man:samba(7) man:smb.conf(5) -
what language is this pal?
I do not kinow what Country you are in but in USA term "pal" is not considered friendly nor nice.
-
-
I do not kinow what Country you are in but in USA term "pal" is not considered friendly nor nice.
Lucky im in England than because pal here = friend, mate, pal etc...
what does the "USA term" for pal mean?
-
what does the "USA term" for pal mean?
Well it can be taken both ways in the Midwest US and it depends on how it's used. We can refer to our friend's as "pals" in a glowing context or when someone upsets us, we can say "look pal, this is the way!" The problem is that most outside of the US probably doesn't understand the meaning when used with different language and tone.
-
That doesn't mean he is from the US. He could have made that observation from dealing with people from the US. Regardless, my point as a US citizen is that "pal" has different meaning depending on how it's used.
-
-
Lucky im in England than because pal here = friend, mate, pal etc...
what does the "USA term" for pal mean?
Well, I am glad that you confirmed that you are in UK. I am well aware what "pal" means in England and, I think it is a great term to describe your friend. It is not so much in US. By the same tocken in UK you describe cigarets as "fags". I would avoid using this term in US as it might be construded as offensive. I am 1000000% for free speach but in cerain countries what we thing is great might be misunderstud. For example showing "thumb" up we thing as an aproval and/or support and in general positive, the same gesture in Turkey will get you into trouble.
Note:
BTW I was born in Europe end go there every year, so I do have some understanding of some language "idiosyncrasys" in various European countries.
-
Well, I am glad that you confirmed that you are in UK. I am well aware what "pal" means in England and, I think it is a great term to describe your friend. It is not so much in US. By the same tocken in UK you describe cigarets as "fags". I would avoid using this term in US as it might be construded as offensive. I am 1000000% for free speach but in cerain countries what we thing is great might be misunderstud. For example showing "thumb" up we thing as an aproval and/or support and in general positive, the same gesture in Turkey will get you into trouble.
So no slag as some snowflake will find it "offensive? or misunderstanding it." I do get your point but how do we all know what means this and that there and where?
man fags/cigs not heard that one in years.
-
So no slag as some snowflake will find it "offensive? or misunderstanding it." I do get your point but how do we all know what means this and that there and where?
man fags/cigs not heard that one in years.
That is the problem and you are right; we do not and cannot be blamed for it. My coment was not to criticize you in any shape or form. I just tried to make you aware of it. As far as "fags", you might be right in London, but if you go outside of London it is still commonly used, to the best of my knowlage.
-
-
That is the problem and you are right; we do not and cannot be blamed for it. My coment was not to criticize you in any shape or form. I just tried to make you aware of it. As far as "fags", you might be right in London, but if you go outside of London it is still commonly used, to the best of my knowlage.
I know and understand "mate" < (this one okay lol) im also no where close to London thank god. I know what you mean and thanks for the knowledge.
-
I know and understand "mate" < (this one okay lol) im also no where close to London thank god. I know what you mean and thanks for the knowledge.
No problem. I satnd corected on 1 point I made --> thumbs up in Turkey. Now it means the same as In UK, US and all other countries. So I was wrong on that point, my bad.
Note:
Me personlay I love the British term "mate", "daft" and "bollocks", so British.
Jetzt mitmachen!
Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!
