What the hell is this ? Is my OMV hacked ?
I can't reach the web GUI from PC and Laptop ! ! ( see screenshot )
To transfer data to an from OMV is possible .
Can login root via putty !
What the hell is this ? Is my OMV hacked ?
I can't reach the web GUI from PC and Laptop ! ! ( see screenshot )
To transfer data to an from OMV is possible .
Can login root via putty !
THX -- works again ! ! But pls explain what happened here ? Instability or a bug ?
Perfect --- problem solved in minutes - awesome forum !
To fix apache being enabled you only need 3 commands.
service apache2 stop
update-rc.d -f apache2 remove
service nginx restart
No reason to mess with php5-fpn or nginx configs No reason to restart php5-fpm either.
Rewriting the configs and restarting fpm doesn't hurt anything.
THX -- works again ! ! But pls explain what happened here ? Instability or a bug ?
Perfect --- problem solved in minutes - awesome forum !
An update must have start apache and altered a few things. Personally, I remove apache from my upgraded systems. Then I never have this problem.
It doesn't hurt but is not necessary. Apache does not effect the php5-fpm service or pool files, so it is running normally. Nor does it mess with php5-fpm or the nginx configs. I see everyone doing it this way all the time. Just thought people would like to save steps.
I don't uninstall apache because many pachages will just install it as a dependency. If it is already installed and run levels removed it will not enable when installed as a dependency.
It is necessary sometimes when upgrading and nginx/fpm configs aren't written. That is where it started. The mkconf steps are instant anyway.
What package installs apache? subversion installs libapr but not apache. I see more problems having apache still on the system than anything else.
I have seen zero problems post removing the run level symlinks. I am just referring to cases where we know apache was enabled, like this latest batch. I would have to look but I assume it is a dependency. How else would some packages enable apache if it were not? I am not talking apache updates.
Obviously, there aren't problems with run level symlinks have been removed. I have seen zero problems with apache removed. No one that installed 1.x fresh will have apache. So, why not uninstall it on 0.5 upgrades? Plus, systems won't even have to keep it updated.
I know it is a dependency of some package. I was asking what package has apache for a dependency? None of the 1.x plugins do. I can't even think of a common, manually installed package that does.
Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!