Posts by sbocquet

Quote from BearFace

Just an update folks, I was able to get temperatures working with OMV5 using the code and guidance provided earlier in this thread by sbocquet. Not as a plugin but by adding a couple of lines here and there, I expect I will have to repeat the process when the next update comes out but the pain in minimal. I needed to keep an eye on the temps on my new OMV5 hardware (BeeLink T4 fanless Atom 8500) that has replaced my trusty Odroid XU4 finally died after 3 yrs of hard service.

Hi,

If you want to make your updates easy, just save your modified files in a .sav files, than copy them after each OMV update.
There are not much changes even none in those files...

Cheers,

Hi !

Same here since 4.19 too...

HI,

I have done the same steps a few days ago and asking me the same question...

OK, I'm gonna try this but wasn't it supposed to be renewed automatically ?

EDIT: It works, but still... it should have been done automatically I think.

Google is your friend

https://itsfoss.com/use-google-drive-linux/

Rdrive seems nice but there are a lot of other solutions.

Personnaly, I use (and contribute a little) on that project https://github.com/abraunegg/onedrive to sync my docs with OneDrive. Works very nice and Alex is doing a very nice job.

Hi,

I'm facing a strange thing.
My certificate is just been renewed last week and I cannot connect to OMV WebUI due to the old certificat expiration date !!
The renew was made by CLI with : certbot renew as I was forced to open my port 80 so that letsencrypt renewal works.

root@home-server:~# certbot certificates
Saving debug log to /var/log/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.log


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Found the following certs:
  Certificate Name: FAMILLE-BOCQUET.FR
    Domains: home-server.famille-bocquet.fr
    Expiry Date: 2018-09-02 10:47:40+00:00 (VALID: 80 days)
    Certificate Path: /etc/letsencrypt/live/FAMILLE-BOCQUET.FR/fullchain.pem
    Private Key Path: /etc/letsencrypt/live/FAMILLE-BOCQUET.FR/privkey.pem
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

But it seems that the new certificate haven't been update for the web server.

How can I fix this ?

Thx

Try rsync with progress bar

https://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/…ess-during-file-transfer/

I managed to make it work in active mode.

Tried remote yesterday's afternoon, then local yesterday's evening.

That's not a firewall problem as there is a connection, and I opened the port 21 on my internet box to make the tests.

Hi Subzero,

I've tried with another user (and root), and still cannot get the folder list.

Is there a default folder to set in Filezilla when the connection start ?

I have set proftpd to be in passive mode and permit root login.
It seems to be some kind of folder rights to me, but cannot resolve it.

Cheers,

Hi,

I have the same problem. Probably a misconfiguration problem but cannot find where…
Proftpd is configured with OMV GUI without any changes. I have tried with Filezilla and WinSCP, both fail. The connection seems to happen but no folder is visible.

Here is my conf file.

root@home-server:/sharedfolders# cat /etc/proftpd/proftpd.conf
Include /etc/proftpd/modules.conf
LoadModule mod_vroot.c
UseIPv6 on
ServerName "home-server"
ServerType standalone
DeferWelcome on
MultilineRFC2228 on
DefaultServer on
ShowSymlinks on
DisplayChdir .message true
ListOptions "-l"
MaxInstances 30
DenyFilter \*.*/
User proftpd
Group nogroup
Umask 000 000
PersistentPasswd off
TimesGMT off
AllowOverwrite on
AuthOrder mod_auth_pam.c* mod_auth_unix.c
DefaultTransferMode ascii
#SystemLog /var/log/proftpd/proftpd.log
<IfModule mod_facl.c>
  FACLEngine on
</IfModule>
<IfModule mod_quotatab.c>
  QuotaEngine off
</IfModule>
<IfModule mod_ratio.c>
  Ratios off
</IfModule>
<IfModule mod_delay.c>
  DelayEngine on
</IfModule>
<IfModule mod_ctrls.c>
  ControlsEngine on
  ControlsMaxClients 2
  ControlsLog /var/log/proftpd/controls.log
  ControlsInterval 5
  ControlsSocket /var/run/proftpd/proftpd.sock
</IfModule>
<IfModule mod_ctrls_admin.c>
  AdminControlsEngine off
</IfModule>
<IfModule mod_vroot.c>
  VRootEngine on
  VRootLog /var/log/proftpd/vroot.log
</IfModule>
Port 21
TransferLog /var/log/proftpd/xferlog
IdentLookups off
UseReverseDNS off
TimeoutIdle 1200
TimeoutNoTransfer 600
TimeoutStalled 600
AllowRetrieveRestart on
AllowStoreRestart on
DeleteAbortedStores off
MaxConnectionsPerHost 5
<Directory />
  HideFiles (welcome.msg)
</Directory>
<IfModule mod_vroot.c>
  VRootAlias "/srv/dev-disk-by-id-ata-SAMSUNG_MZ7LN512HCHP-000L1_S1ZKNXAG526958-part5/FTP" "FTP"
</IfModule>
<Directory /FTP>
  <Limit ALL>
    AllowUser OR root
    AllowGroup OR root
    DenyAll
  </Limit>
  <Limit READ DIRS>
    AllowUser OR root
    AllowGroup OR root
    DenyAll
  </Limit>
</Directory>
<IfModule mod_auth.c>
  DefaultRoot /srv/ftp
  MaxClients 3
  MaxLoginAttempts 3
  RequireValidShell on
  RootLogin on
  # This option is useless because this is handled via the PAM
  # pam_listfile.so module, so set it to 'off' by default.
  UseFtpUsers off
</IfModule>
<IfModule mod_auth_pam.c>
  AuthPAM on
  AuthPAMConfig proftpd
</IfModule>
<IfModule mod_ban.c>
  BanEngine off
  BanControlsACLs all allow user root
  BanLog /var/log/proftpd/ban.log
  BanMessage Host %a has been banned
  BanTable /var/run/proftpd/ban.tab
</IfModule>
DisplayLogin /srv/ftp/welcome.msg
<IfModule mod_wrap.c>
  TCPAccessFiles /etc/hosts.allow /etc/hosts.deny
  TCPAccessSyslogLevels info warn
  TCPServiceName ftpd
</IfModule>

Any idea of what is going wrong ?

Hi,

Just to let you know that I have successfully update my ZFS pool from kernel 4.14/ZFS 0.7.6 to kernel 4.16/ZFS 0.7.9

1st => Update ZFS from 0.7.6 to 0.7.9., than reboot the NAS. The pool cannot be mounted (as expected) but don't panic
2nd => Update from kernel 4.14 to kernel 4.16, than reboot the NAS. The pool is mounted and healthy.

Thanks all for your advices.

Quote from ryecoaaron

A lot of the zfs plugin problems are due to the kernel and zfs versions. Moving to Ubuntu would definitely fix that. Even if zfs was a core feature (not going to happen), it would still have to be maintained. If OMV 5.x is designed around btrfs, I think it will be easier to make zfs "happy".

I don't want to be rude, but please, save us from BTRFS

Honestly, I don't mind using one or the other, I'm not a church preacher. I just want something that works and secures my datas; but in 2018, BTRFS development is near death ;)...
If Oracle (and I don't like them too ) use ZFS in Solaris, believe me, it's because it's rock solid, unlike BTRFS. ZoL is probably not as solid as ZFS on Solaris, but clearly, it is far ahead.

https://www.ixsystems.com/blog/open-zfs-vs-btrfs/
http://blog.fosketts.net/2017/07/10/zfs-best-filesystem-now/

We will see...

Quote from ryecoaaron

What do you mean by native?

I know Debian cannot have ZFS directly after finished the install (and so OMV), but ZFS is a must have when you come to NAS storage.

Maybe the Ubuntu way (and don't get me wrong, I really prefer Debian) should be consider as ZFS should be a basic feature out of the box for a NAS.
I clearly don't speak for myself as I work all day on computers, but let's think of basic users.

On the other hand, the ZFS plugin is doing some really good work for that... but when problems comes, and they come, you have to know what your doing. Plus you have to update/maintain the plugin...

I only use Debian as server (work and home) and Windows/Mint LMDE as Workstation (home), and I just can be agree with you... OMV need ZFS as a 'native' storage solution.

I work all days on Solaris 11 with native ZFS storage, and I cannot go back to RAID/ext 4 without feeling 'in danger'.
File checksum is a must have, and so the snapshots... They solve some of my problem before it happens !

Quote from sbocquet

I don't know…

For me, I'm with a 4.14 kernel from the backports repo, which installed me certbot v0.23 as I suppose, which is running with python 3.x
At the moment, this should work as it seems that I have the necessary packages to… but there is a mystery that I have to understand before my cert expired…

OK... I found the problem with the letsencrypt forum...

So, as always, it was so simple that I haven't though of it (RTFM !).

My port 80 was only opened to my internal network in the firewall, and certbot need a file to be seen globally in order to renew the certificat.
So I opened the port 80, renew my cert and closed it after.

I have just asked if this can be done through HTTPS, else I will do the same in 90 days...

Hi there

So, I was wondering if I can go with the ZFS update to v0.7.9 with my 4.14 kernel as I can see the ZFS package are available ?
I have the linux-headers installed for that kernel.

root@home-server:~# apt-get upgrade --dry-run
Lecture des listes de paquets... Fait
Construction de l'arbre des dépendances
Lecture des informations d'état... Fait
Calcul de la mise à jour... Fait
Les paquets suivants ont été conservés :
  linux-headers-amd64 linux-image-amd64
Les paquets suivants seront mis à jour :
  libnvpair1linux libuutil1linux libzfs2linux libzpool2linux spl-dkms zfs-dkms zfs-zed zfsutils-linux
8 mis à jour, 0 nouvellement installés, 0 à enlever et 2 non mis à jour.
Inst spl-dkms [0.7.6-1~bpo9+1] (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [all]) [zfs-dkms:amd64 on spl-dkms:amd64] [zfs-dkms:amd64 ]
Conf spl-dkms (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [all]) [zfs-dkms:amd64 ]
Inst zfs-dkms [0.7.6-1~bpo9+1] (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [all]) [zfsutils-linux:amd64 on zfs-dkms:amd64] [zfsutils-linux:amd64 ]
Inst zfsutils-linux [0.7.6-1~bpo9+1] (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64]) []
Inst libuutil1linux [0.7.6-1~bpo9+1] (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64]) []
Inst libnvpair1linux [0.7.6-1~bpo9+1] (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64]) []
Inst libzpool2linux [0.7.6-1~bpo9+1] (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64]) []
Inst libzfs2linux [0.7.6-1~bpo9+1] (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64])
Inst zfs-zed [0.7.6-1~bpo9+1] (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64])
Conf zfs-dkms (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [all])
Conf zfsutils-linux (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64])
Conf libuutil1linux (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64])
Conf libnvpair1linux (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64])
Conf libzpool2linux (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64])
Conf libzfs2linux (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64])
Conf zfs-zed (0.7.9-3~bpo9+1 Debian Backports:stretch-backports [amd64])

Do you see any risk ?
If that doesn't work, can I rollback if I keep my current conf available at boot ?

Thx

P.S : Don't you think we could add a specific zone in the forum for all the ZFS stuff, like for RAID or in the Configuration section ? This could be a good improvment no ?

I don't know…

For me, I'm with a 4.14 kernel from the backports repo, which installed me certbot v0.23 as I suppose, which is running with python 3.x
At the moment, this should work as it seems that I have the necessary packages to… but there is a mystery that I have to understand before my cert expired…

Yes, it seems to be the same except that you're running python 2.7...

2018-05-31 22:05:21,594:DEBUG:certbot.main:Exiting abnormally:


Traceback (most recent call last):


  File "/usr/bin/certbot", line 11, in <module>


    load_entry_point('certbot==0.10.2', 'console_scripts', 'certbot')()


  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/certbot/main.py", line 849, in main


    return config.func(config, plugins)


  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/certbot/main.py", line 655, in renew


    renewal.handle_renewal_request(config)


  File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/certbot/renewal.py", line 430, in handle_renewal_request


    len(renew_failures), len(parse_failures)))


Error: 1 renew failure(s), 0 parse failure(s)

and me python 3.0

Traceback (most recent call last):


  File "/usr/bin/certbot", line 11, in <module>


    load_entry_point('certbot==0.23.0', 'console_scripts', 'certbot')()


  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/certbot/main.py", line 1266, in main


    return config.func(config, plugins)


  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/certbot/main.py", line 1179, in renew


    renewal.handle_renewal_request(config)


  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/certbot/renewal.py", line 443, in handle_renewal_request


    len(renew_failures), len(parse_failures)))


certbot.errors.Error: 1 renew failure(s), 0 parse failure(s)

I was thinking it was

root@home-server:/etc/apt/sources.list.d# apt-cache policy certbot
certbot:
  Installé : 0.23.0-1~bpo9+1
  Candidat : 0.23.0-1~bpo9+1
 Table de version :
 *** 0.23.0-1~bpo9+1 100
        100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
     0.10.2-1 500
        500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian stretch/main amd64 Packages