Just an update.
The virtual disk in Proxmox is VirtIO SCSI with Cache "Write back", if someone needs the info. 
I created a "standard" encrypted device from within OMV Web GUI and created a ext4 filesystem on that encrypted disk, and the performance is good, much better than I got in vmware ESXi.
Does anyone have any input? Because I think I need to do my storage disk soon.
Hi,
I'm running OMV virtual on a Proxmox Host.
I'm using virtual disks on a LVM-Thin and the physical disk is an old WD20EFRX.
I have done some benchmarking with this command,
fio --name=random-write --ioengine=posixaio --rw=randwrite --bs=64k --size=256m --numjobs=16 --iodepth=16 --runtime=60 --time_based --end_fsync=1
Here is the results of the benchmarks,
VirtIO SCSI no encryption ext4
WRITE: bw=51.9MiB/s (54.4MB/s), 2993KiB/s-3552KiB/s (3065kB/s-3637kB/s), io=13.0GiB (15.0GB), run=275997-276014msec
VirtIO Block no encryption ext4
WRITE: bw=41.1MiB/s (43.1MB/s), 2473KiB/s-2871KiB/s (2532kB/s-2940kB/s), io=11.5GiB (12.4GB), run=287090-287102msec
VirtIO SCSI no encryption xfs
WRITE: bw=14.3MiB/s (15.0MB/s), 735KiB/s-1266KiB/s (752kB/s-1296kB/s), io=1978MiB (2074MB), run=131204-138065msec
VirtIO Block no encryption xfs
WRITE: bw=10.4MiB/s (10.9MB/s), 588KiB/s-823KiB/s (602kB/s-843kB/s), io=2039MiB (2138MB), run=195132-195315msec
VirtIO SCSI no encryption btrfs
WRITE: bw=19.2MiB/s (20.2MB/s), 984KiB/s-1642KiB/s (1008kB/s-1681kB/s), io=1784MiB (1871MB), run=91527-92795msec
VirtIO Block no encryption btrfs
WRITE: bw=11.4MiB/s (11.9MB/s), 673KiB/s-774KiB/s (690kB/s-793kB/s), io=8077MiB (8469MB), run=710188-710607msec
VirtIO SCSI encryption ext4
WRITE: bw=19.9MiB/s (20.9MB/s), 1227KiB/s-1305KiB/s (1257kB/s-1336kB/s), io=3525MiB (3696MB), run=177168-177181msec
VirtIO Block encryption ext4
WRITE: bw=19.4MiB/s (20.4MB/s), 1139KiB/s-1328KiB/s (1167kB/s-1359kB/s), io=3614MiB (3790MB), run=186075-186081msec
As I understand it should both BTRFS and XFS be faster than EXT4? But it does not look like this in this benchmark. XFS might only be faster on bigger files?
I also have AES-NI activated for the VM on the CPU, so I tought the encryption should be faster, but it's 30MiB/s slower with encryption enabled.
What am I doing wrong? 
Thanks.
or here:
/etc/monit/conf.d/openmediavault-system.conf
Thanks 
That's what I'm looking for, had been nice to do some tweaking from the web gui though.
Soma I don't want to remove the notification, just tweak it a bit.
Hi,
When I'm running backups and saving them to a SMB storage on OMV I get a lot of notifications about "load average", is it possible to change the values when to receieve a notification about this?
Thanks.
Hi,
I'm using an encrypted storage drive, and after a reboot, when I have to unlock the encrypted volume, I also have to remount the NFS shares under /export.
Could this be triggered automatic after the encrypted volume is unlocked?
Like the way FreeNAS is doing, it asks if you want to restart file share services after you unlock an encrypted volume.
Thanks.
I have this working with no issues, I have no extra options set, no log queries set, and the only other difference is my dns server is pi-hole.
Ok this is going to be a 'suck eggs question' on any network machine are you 'releasing' the current ip address and then 'renew' so the machine sends a dhcp request. Anything on my network then appears in the leases tab, and any static entries I have created are entered in the static entries tab.
Ofc, i do an IP release and renew... but they are timed out. When I then enable the DHCP on my router again and try to renew the IP it works directly... So somehow the DHCP part of dnsmasq isn't starting.... Any ideas or should I ask in the Debian forum?
Ok Domain Name vsk is that the same as set under Network>>>General>>>Domain name
Yes... but that's more of a DNS question.. I think I got the DNS to work now but not the DHCP.
Did you try it without the extra options? You shouldn’t need dhcp-authoritative and expand-hosts is already written to the config file by default. And just to make sure, your network adapter is actually eth0? Also not sure why you only want it to listen on eth0.
Yes, I have tried without the extra options also. Well, yes, if I check with ifconfig the adapter for the LAN is eth0. Well, I don't wan't the DHCP to listen on my VPN tun0 for example.
Your domain doesn't look right but post of screenshot of the plugin's settings tab.
I wan't to have .vsk as domain... so computer.vsk server.vsk and so on.
Here is scrot from config. (DHCP is disabled for the moment because it didn't worked so I got to use my routers DHCP again).
(
This is using the plugin?
Yes.
Well the DHCP-Request is sent out, but I don't get any answer from the DHCP-Server in dnsmasq...
Hi,
I got this error when I submitted a thread here on the form,
ID: 788c13c5d544446e49cdbbe86afd7ec732786d04
The thread did got posted tough.
Hi,
I can't get the DHCP server to function with dnsmasq and can't use it to lookup local domains. I have not the DHCP-server activted for the moment, because it didn't work, so I use my routers for the moment. But when I active the one in the dnsmasq plugin and disable the one in the router I can't get any IP or information from the DHCP in dnsmasq.
# Configuration file for dnsmasq.
# By default, dnsmasq will send queries to any of the upstream
# servers it knows about and tries to favour servers to are known
# to be up. Uncommenting this forces dnsmasq to try each query
# with each server strictly in the order they appear in
# /etc/resolv.conf
strict-order
# Add local-only domains here, queries in these domains are answered
# from /etc/hosts or DHCP only.
local=/vsk/
# Set this (and domain: see below) if you want to have a domain
# automatically added to simple names in a hosts-file.
expand-hosts
# Set the domain for dnsmasq. this is optional, but if it is set, it
# does the following things.
# 1) Allows DHCP hosts to have fully qualified domain names, as long
# as the domain part matches this setting.
# 2) Sets the "domain" DHCP option thereby potentially setting the
# domain of all systems configured by DHCP
# 3) Provides the domain part for "expand-hosts"
domain=vsk
log-queries
# Extra options
listen-address=127.0.0.1,192.168.1.20
expand-hosts
interface=eth0# Dynamic resolv.conf(5) file for glibc resolver(3) generated by resolvconf(8)
# DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE BY HAND -- YOUR CHANGES WILL BE OVERWRITTEN
nameserver 127.0.0.1
search vskI don't find any information about this Vulnerability. Have you released the kernel update for this? 
Best Regards,
Noiden
That is really important. Sharing the root of the data drive is really bad.
Why? Is it messing up the permissions?
I think it's easy to not have to mount so many locations on the clients... =)
I have the same problem, for me it has nothing to do with docker though.
After a reboot, I have to set the ACL's on the share again, or ssh to the OMV-server and chown the folders.
I'm using lukscrypt if that could have anything to do with it.
Man.. you guys are going to make me mess with Trakt tv... This should be easy to fix. I try to look at it tomorrow.
So how did it go? =)
My plex user got the right home directory, still error tough. Fuzeman says that installing the libraries the plugin needs with pip might solve it, but I asked him to write how to install the libraries in the bug thred on github.
This is the only plugin I'm using that have "bult in" libraries, so I don't know if other plugins fails. But I think all plugins that have some kind of libraries or programs "built in" that need to be run, will fail because the data disk i noexec.
You are right. I was thinking that was default location for the plexmediaserver folder before it is moved to data drive. I am working on something..
I have to look it up...
I have already fixed the symlink =) I have another error with the plug-in now, but it's posted to the one making the plug-in on github. =)
Thanks for the help tough. =)