changes by omv gui are done but not applied" as well.
What do you mean with this?
What happens and how to reproduce it?
Screenshots and pasted errors do wonders.
changes by omv gui are done but not applied" as well.
What do you mean with this?
What happens and how to reproduce it?
Screenshots and pasted errors do wonders.
What do you mean with this?
What happens and how to reproduce it?
Screenshots and pasted errors do wonders.
Hi Soma, I am missing the yellow banner on top asking me to "apply" settings afte having done somm configuration by OMV web gui.
Sorry, no screenshot possible due it will not show up any more. But I mean the yellow banner you are talking about in
So if I make a change by OMV gui nothing happens. If I check again settings, it is still set but due missing apply button nothing happens. For example changing gui to https:// access it is done but not working. No yellow banner. No pending configuration. Nothing.
Been able to take some screenshots. Changing back ssl/tsl secure connection - after pressing "save" just a green confirmation. no yellow "apply pending configuration" banner on top
Just tested on mine and I have the same behaviour
Alles anzeigenHi Soma, I am missing the yellow banner on top asking me to "apply" settings afte having done somm configuration by OMV web gui.
Sorry, no screenshot possible due it will not show up any more. But I mean the yellow banner you are talking about in
BeitragRE: No System Information on Dashboard@votdev
Sorry for misleading you, just tried to disable a scheduled task (for eg) and there's no issue with the yellow banner coming up:
forum.openmediavault.org/wsc/index.php?attachment/31801/
So if I make a change by OMV gui nothing happens. If I check again settings, it is still set but due missing apply button nothing happens. For example changing gui to https:// access it is done but not working. No yellow banner. No pending configuration. Nothing.
Been able to take some screenshots. Changing back ssl/tsl secure connection - after pressing "save" just a green confirmation. no yellow "apply pending configuration" banner on top
Upgrade to version 6.7.0-3.
After installation of the 6.7.0.3 when I try to apply the changes, I got error: 500-Internal server error:...
Some suggestion to fix it ?
Thanks
After installation of the 6.7.0.3 when I try to apply the changes, I got error: 500-Internal server error:...
Some suggestion to fix it ?
Thanks
Have you tried to clear the browser cache?
Ctrl+Shift+R
Solved thanks
I installed 6.7.0-3 and it fixed all my issues as of now. Thank you for the quick fix OMV team!
Now I have this strange behavior.
I have an RPI4B SBC with Raspberry OS 64bit lite updated, OMV 6.7.0.3.
I have attached 1 HD SSD 1TB EXT4 and all is OK.
If I try to attach the 2nd HD 4TB NTFS with the USB hub with power supply, so no power problems, and in OMV GUI I see it in Disks folder but when I mount it in File Systems, the window to select it as already with a file system, doesn't select any drive...
I have tried the HD on Wind10 and it works.
I need this NTFS because sometimes I need to update some files from the PC WIn10...
Any suggestions ?
Thanks
Ant
This seems to only affect Raspberry, I guess everyone who has reported here uses Raspberry.
I just tried the update in a vm and although the screen got stuck after updating, Ctrl+Shift+R resolved it and the GUI is still fully operable without errors.
I can confirm this. I run two instances of OMV: one on a Raspberry Pi 4, and one on an E5-2690. I always update both machines at the same time every morning. This morning when I booted up the dashboard on the Pi was showing all red warnings, and wouldn't load the update status. My other instance was fine. Switching to the system tab I was able to install today's update and it is fixed.
Alles anzeigen
Can you please run on CLI:
sudo omv-upgrade and see if everything is OK after? (should be)
Ok, on the GUI, go to System-> Update Managment-> Updates and click on the Magnifying Lens to search for new updates and update from there to 6.7.0-3
Both issues are solved (tiles+apply settings banner) with the latest update, thanks a lot.
Alles anzeigenNow I have this strange behavior.
I have an RPI4B SBC with Raspberry OS 64bit lite updated, OMV 6.7.0.3.
I have attached 1 HD SSD 1TB EXT4 and all is OK.
If I try to attach the 2nd HD 4TB NTFS with the USB hub with power supply, so no power problems, and in OMV GUI I see it in "Storage/Disks" folder but when I mount it in "Storage/File Systems", the window to select it "as already with a file system", doesn't select any drive... So I cannot use it...
I have tried the HD on Wind10 and it works.
I need this NTFS file system because sometimes I need to update some files from the PC WIn10...
Any suggestions ?
Thanks and Have a Beautiful WE !
Ant
Someone has a suggestion to solve this issue ?
Thanks Ant
Many thanks also from me. 😊
The btrfs filesystem could be mounted via GUI again, also all other configurations could be executed via GUI again.
Unfortunately the dashboard shows the wrong free capacity of my btrfs filesystem (I originally created a btrfs array from two 12TB HDD via CLI during the first OMV installation).
I don't want to misuse this post for this problem, but I would be grateful for a suggestion to solve the problem.
I have already searched the web and am hopeful that I can solve the issue with "btrfs balance".
(Sorry, I am still a very inexperienced Linux/btrfs user. 🫣)
Apart from that I just made a PayPal donation to the OMV project as an appreciation of the great open source work. 👍👍
Alles anzeigenMany thanks also from me. 😊
The btrfs filesystem could be mounted via GUI again, also all other configurations could be executed via GUI again.
Unfortunately the dashboard shows the wrong free capacity of my btrfs filesystem (I originally created a btrfs array from two 12TB HDD via CLI during the first OMV installation).
I don't want to misuse this post for this problem, but I would be grateful for a suggestion to solve the problem.
I have already searched the web and am hopeful that I can solve the issue with "btrfs balance".
(Sorry, I am still a very inexperienced Linux/btrfs user. 🫣)
Apart from that I just made a PayPal donation to the OMV project as an appreciation of the great open source work. 👍👍
Could you please run btrfs fi show <DEVICE> and btrfs fi df -b <DEVICE> and btrfs inspect-internal dump-super <DEVICE> and post the output here.
Could you please run btrfs fi show <DEVICE> and btrfs fi df -b <DEVICE> and btrfs inspect-internal dump-super <DEVICE> and post the output here.
This is output:
sudo btrfs fi show /srv/dev-disk-by-uuid-d4550281-2f08-4c98-a828-ab38dd959c7c/
Label: none uuid: d4550281-2f08-4c98-a828-ab38dd959c7c
Total devices 2 FS bytes used 4.97TiB
devid 1 size 10.91TiB used 5.43TiB path /dev/sda
devid 2 size 10.91TiB used 5.43TiB path /dev/sdb
sudo btrfs fi df -b /srv/dev-disk-by-uuid-d4550281-2f08-4c98-a828-ab38dd959c7c/
Data, RAID1: total=5966783315968, used=5455739400192
System, RAID1: total=8388608, used=868352
Metadata, RAID1: total=7516192768, used=6026444800
GlobalReserve, single: total=536870912, used=0
sudo btrfs inspect-internal dump-super /srv/dev-disk-by-uuid-d4550281-2f08-4c98-a828-ab38dd959c7c/
ERROR: failed to read the superblock on /srv/dev-disk-by-uuid-d4550281-2f08-4c98-a828-ab38dd959c7c/ at 65536
ERROR: error = 'Is a directory', errno = 21
sudo btrfs filesystem usage /srv/dev-disk-by-uuid-d4550281-2f08-4c98-a828-ab38dd959c7c
Overall:
Device size: 21.83TiB
Device allocated: 10.87TiB
Device unallocated: 10.96TiB
Device missing: 0.00B
Used: 9.93TiB
Free (estimated): 5.94TiB (min: 5.94TiB)
Free (statfs, df): 5.94TiB
Data ratio: 2.00
Metadata ratio: 2.00
Global reserve: 512.00MiB (used: 0.00B)
Multiple profiles: no
Data,RAID1: Size:5.43TiB, Used:4.96TiB (91.44%)
/dev/sda 5.43TiB
/dev/sdb 5.43TiB
Metadata,RAID1: Size:7.00GiB, Used:5.61GiB (80.18%)
/dev/sda 7.00GiB
/dev/sdb 7.00GiB
System,RAID1: Size:8.00MiB, Used:848.00KiB (10.35%)
/dev/sda 8.00MiB
/dev/sdb 8.00MiB
Unallocated:
/dev/sda 5.48TiB
/dev/sdb 5.48TiB
Screenshots shows btrfs file system in GUI and this is what I don't understand. Why seems brtfs filesystem to be out of space (red bar in both screenshots)?
Screenshots shows btrfs file system in GUI and this is what I don't understand. Why seems brtfs filesystem to be out of space (red bar in both screenshots)?
Bug will be fixed in the next released version, see https://github.com/openmediava…13074f7cb31954fe2449b928d.
Sie haben noch kein Benutzerkonto auf unserer Seite? Registrieren Sie sich kostenlos und nehmen Sie an unserer Community teil!