Posts by bookie56

OK....Good enough for me....

Thank you!

bookie56

Hi again!

Seen a lot on the forum about this "no arrays found in config file or automatically..

I have checked the output of fstab:

root@DN-Storage1:~# nano /etc/fstab
  GNU nano 3.2                                    /etc/fstab

# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
# device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
# that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
#
# <file system> <mount point>   <type>  <options>       <dump>  <pass>
# / was on /dev/sdf1 during installation
UUID=17360846-cd1f-4a35-96c8-7d9813ebb74c /               ext4    noatime,nodiratime,errors=remount-ro 0$
# swap was on /dev/sdf5 during installation
#UUID=6bc5c04f-1288-4885-946a-2150966e957c none            swap    sw              0       0
/dev/sr0        /media/cdrom0   udf,iso9660 user,noauto     0       0
# >>> [openmediavault]

# <<< [openmediavault]


                                           [ Läste 15 rader ]
^G Få hjälp    ^O Skriv ut    ^W Var finns   ^K Klipp ut    ^J Justera     ^C Akt. pos    M-U Ångra
^X Avsluta     ^R Läs fil     ^\ Ersätt      ^U Ångra klipp ^T Stavkontr.  ^_ Gå till rad M-E Gör om

Ok in the above my boot installation is on the usb and it is sde1 and not as stated sdf1 but as that doesn't matter here...

I have also checked the readout for:

root@DN-Storage1:~# nano /etc/fstab
root@DN-Storage1:~# nano /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume
  GNU nano 3.2                        /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume

RESUME=UUID=<17360846-cd1f-4a35-96c8-7d9813ebb74c>


                                             [ Läste 1 rad ]
^G Få hjälp    ^O Skriv ut    ^W Var finns   ^K Klipp ut    ^J Justera     ^C Akt. pos    M-U Ångra
^X Avsluta     ^R Läs fil     ^\ Ersätt      ^U Ångra klipp ^T Stavkontr.  ^_ Gå till rad M-E Gör om

the uuid is the right one for my boot device....so why am I getting so many "no arrays found in config file or automatically"?

bookie56

Hi guys!

Thanks for the helpful advice....used gparted and changed the sizes and now that is working ok...

One thing though....getting the following on boot:

no arrays found in config file automatically

This comes up about 30 times on boot...not using raid have zfs....

Any suggestions?

bookie56

Hi KM0201

I have found what has happened and I don't really understand why...

Some one tell me why installing on my USB has created a swap of 12GB that I don't even use.....?!

When one installs OMV it takes the whole drive so we don't get a chance to dictate partition sizes etc...

So why would OMV decide to allocate 12GB to a swap that I am not even using.....

Has anyone any suggestions?

bookie56

Hi guys!

I have one of my servers booting from a flash drive 16GB....

Everything has worked fine but updating it is a bit of a problem....

When I run Update I get error from the UI so I tried via Putty and get this error:

http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/buster/main/source/Sources Write error - write (28: The device is full)

Is there a way to remove stuff not needed?

Do I need to upgrade to a larger flash drive?

If upgrading to a larger flash drive is the option - then how do I clone this to a larger drive without needing to do a complet reinstall?

bookie56

Hi again dleidert

I apologise for not giving you the exact readouts of the commands....

The systemd service is now running with the right information nameserver information...

I will confess to loving Linux but not having the indepth knowledge that you have...

Work on a daily basis with fixing problems with Windows....so never quite have enough time over....anyone dealing with the crap Windows 10 knows what I mean.

I appreciate your patience and help!

bookie56

Hi dieidert

I thought I already had...

root@DN-Storage1:~# nano /etc/resolv.conf
  GNU nano 3.2                                 /etc/resolv.conf

nameserver 192.168.1.1

root@DN-Storage1:~# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 192.168.1.1
root@DN-Storage1:~#


root@DN-Storage1:~# ls -lA /etc/resolv.conf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 23 apr 12  2020 /etc/resolv.conf
root@DN-Storage1:~#

It points as I have already said to my old routers gateway.

I have tried to implement via web interface a static IP even if my router sends out dhcp...that didn't work....

I tried to set it via omv-firstaid to a static IP but that didn't work....

bookie56

Hi guys!

Thanks for helping...

OK...

I, as I stated above, have pfSense as my router. I am using the built in network card for WAN and have an Intel Quad Port card for my networks...

I have been trying to get around to setting up my office at home so that my private network doesn't overlap my company one....

So, I have set up LAN_PRIVATE and WIFI_PRIVATE and the same for my company....LAN_COMPANY and WFI_COMPANY...each of these networks is a subnet.

Both of the Wifi networks are physically connected to their own Access Points.

I have set up aliases for my networks so that the Private networks do not talk to the Company ones.....

This is working fine...

Just that my OMV servers doesn't seem to want to work with the new firewalls DNS?

When I checked the /etc/resolv.conf it is still using my old firewalls gateway....?

I hear you SinE (don't have a pi-hole running on my network and I shouldn't need to set up this manually?

With the initial installation of OMV via dhcp it gets its settings then and that works fine....

I have already run OMV-Firstaid to force the new network IPs to be found and that also works fine...

As I said before...I have reserved my whole network as before with dd-wrt...

Just seems strange I have to set my DNS manually now...

Any thoughts?

bookie56

Hi dieidert😀

I have them set on dhcp and allocated ip's by pfsense as reserved mac addresses with as I had with dd-wrt. I can check /etc/resoive.conf A bit strange. When I added them to pfsense I gave them new ip's but that was no problem after running omv-firstaid.

Hi guys....

A few weeks ago I took the plunge and built a pfsense router....

I have allowed all traffic on my home network and most of my computers haven't a problem.....but can't seem to update my omv servers?

I get the same error from all of them "couldn't resolve deb.debian.org?

I have a standard installation of Debian on my work server and that has no problem...

Does anyone have any ideas.

I have even reserved all of my computers in prsense...

Why am not being able to update my servers...I have seven with the same problem....

bookie56

P.S should have said that I have 5.5.6-1

Sorry this should have been posted in General....

Ok thanks!

Ok thanks for you time!

bookie56

Hi Adoby

Yes...it is a system drive usb and cloning I can do via my clonezilla server....

Just wondered if there was a more simple solution...

bookie56

Hi guys

Ok...I am using several servers with USB for OMV....

What is the best way to backup these drives?

bookie56

Hi raulfg3

OK..thanks I will do that...

I don't need to mount it in another O.S.

I will have a read and see what gives...

Thanks for coming by on a Sunday...

bookie56

Hi Guys.....

Can someone remind me what I should be thinking here:

Some supported features are not enabled on the pool. The pool can still be used, but some features are unavailable. Action: Enable all features using 'zpool upgrade'. Once this is done, the pool may no longer be accessible by the software that does not support the features.

Don't want to start crying because I made a bobo.....lol

bookie56

Hi macom!

Exactly right...that is what I did and now everything is ok again....

So now I have fixed the omv-extras and then the flash memory....

Thanks guys for coming by...

bookie56

When I checked the boot parameter it was right so how do I change what is right....?

bookie56

Hi guys!

I have been getting similar problems when installing from a USB....after install I remove the USB and it goes often to (initramfs) bloody frustrating...just checked that theory and rebooted with the install USB and OMV boots as normal?

What gives guys?

bookie56

Quote from cabrio_leo

... and the new smilies are abysmally ugly.

But are you smiling.....lol

bookie56